Excessive Takeover Premiums Paid by Acquiring Banks Controlled by Mutual Banks: The Case of Crédit Agricole–Crédit Lyonnais

Frédéric Lobez, A. Schatt
{"title":"Excessive Takeover Premiums Paid by Acquiring Banks Controlled by Mutual Banks: The Case of Crédit Agricole–Crédit Lyonnais","authors":"Frédéric Lobez, A. Schatt","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2079461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In France, mutual banks played a key role during the recent period of consolidation of the banking industry because they acquired many privately listed banks. Our analysis of the acquisition of the private bank Credit Lyonnais by the mutual bank Credit Agricole illustrates three findings. First, the mutual bank had to create a new private bank (CASA), which went public to raise the capital needed to finance this megadeal. However, there are conflicts of interest between controlling shareholders (mutual bank) and minority shareholders of CASA. Second, the weak governance of CASA enabled managers to pay a very high premium in the takeover bid. Third, this excessive premium prompted financial markets to react negatively to the announcement of the megadeal, such that CASA’s market value fell to about €2.5 billion. In summary, conflicts of interest in the banking industry between minority shareholders and controlling shareholders of the bidder appear particularly serious when the blockholder is a mutual bank.","PeriodicalId":374825,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference of the French Finance Association (AFFI) (Archive)","volume":"290 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference of the French Finance Association (AFFI) (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2079461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In France, mutual banks played a key role during the recent period of consolidation of the banking industry because they acquired many privately listed banks. Our analysis of the acquisition of the private bank Credit Lyonnais by the mutual bank Credit Agricole illustrates three findings. First, the mutual bank had to create a new private bank (CASA), which went public to raise the capital needed to finance this megadeal. However, there are conflicts of interest between controlling shareholders (mutual bank) and minority shareholders of CASA. Second, the weak governance of CASA enabled managers to pay a very high premium in the takeover bid. Third, this excessive premium prompted financial markets to react negatively to the announcement of the megadeal, such that CASA’s market value fell to about €2.5 billion. In summary, conflicts of interest in the banking industry between minority shareholders and controlling shareholders of the bidder appear particularly serious when the blockholder is a mutual bank.
由相互银行控制的收购银行支付过高的收购溢价:以crassdit agricole - crassdit Lyonnais为例
在法国,互助银行在最近的银行业整合中发挥了关键作用,因为它们收购了许多私人上市银行。我们对互助银行法国农业信贷银行(Credit Agricole)收购私人银行里昂信贷银行(Credit Lyonnais)的分析显示了三个发现。首先,互助银行必须创建一家新的私人银行(CASA),该银行上市以筹集这笔巨额交易所需的资金。但是,中航控股股东(互助银行)与中小股东之间存在利益冲突。其次,CASA的薄弱治理使得管理者能够在收购报价中支付非常高的溢价。第三,这种过高的溢价促使金融市场对这笔巨额交易的宣布做出负面反应,使得CASA的市值跌至约25亿欧元。综上所述,在银行业中,当大股东是互助银行时,竞购方的小股东与控股股东之间的利益冲突显得尤为严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信