Comparative Analysis of Various Machine Learning Techniques for Flood Prediction

Sajimon Abraham, Jyothish V R, Sijo Thomas, Benymol Jose
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Various Machine Learning Techniques for Flood Prediction","authors":"Sajimon Abraham, Jyothish V R, Sijo Thomas, Benymol Jose","doi":"10.1109/ICITIIT54346.2022.9744177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A flood is a most destructive disaster that affects people, places, and lives. Due to the complication in data availability, flood prediction is always a challenging task. The conventional mode of disaster management relies on satellite images and radar outcomes. It takes enormous time for processing. Machine learning paved the way for a new perspective on this hydrological problem. Recent developments in Machine Learning (ML) and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) have led to a state-of-the-art implementation and prediction. The major objective of this work is to recognize the most accurate machine learning model to identify flood occurrence, by comparing Logistic regression, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and Support Vector Machines classifiers. Machine Learning strategies are evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, RMSE, and accuracy metrics. All the strategies are applied to one-feature dataset, three-feature dataset and four-feature dataset. The quantitative evaluation demonstrates that decision tree algorithm is most suitable for flood prediction and it exponentially grows with respect to the number of features examined.","PeriodicalId":184353,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Information Technology (ICITIIT)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Information Technology (ICITIIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITIIT54346.2022.9744177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A flood is a most destructive disaster that affects people, places, and lives. Due to the complication in data availability, flood prediction is always a challenging task. The conventional mode of disaster management relies on satellite images and radar outcomes. It takes enormous time for processing. Machine learning paved the way for a new perspective on this hydrological problem. Recent developments in Machine Learning (ML) and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) have led to a state-of-the-art implementation and prediction. The major objective of this work is to recognize the most accurate machine learning model to identify flood occurrence, by comparing Logistic regression, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and Support Vector Machines classifiers. Machine Learning strategies are evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, RMSE, and accuracy metrics. All the strategies are applied to one-feature dataset, three-feature dataset and four-feature dataset. The quantitative evaluation demonstrates that decision tree algorithm is most suitable for flood prediction and it exponentially grows with respect to the number of features examined.
洪水预测中各种机器学习技术的比较分析
洪水是一种最具破坏性的灾难,影响到人、地方和生命。由于数据可用性的复杂性,洪水预测一直是一项具有挑战性的任务。传统的灾害管理模式依赖于卫星图像和雷达结果。它需要大量的时间来处理。机器学习为这个水文问题的新视角铺平了道路。机器学习(ML)和信息通信技术(ICT)的最新发展导致了最先进的实施和预测。这项工作的主要目标是通过比较逻辑回归、决策树、朴素贝叶斯和支持向量机分类器,识别出最准确的机器学习模型来识别洪水的发生。使用精度、召回率、f1分数、RMSE和准确性指标来评估机器学习策略。这些策略分别应用于单特征数据集、三特征数据集和四特征数据集。定量评价结果表明,决策树算法最适合洪水预测,其特征数量呈指数增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信