Perfectly secure message transmission over partially synchronous networks

R. Kishore, Anupriya Inumella, K. Srinathan
{"title":"Perfectly secure message transmission over partially synchronous networks","authors":"R. Kishore, Anupriya Inumella, K. Srinathan","doi":"10.1145/3288599.3288612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a distributed network, we consider two special nodes called the sender S and the receiver R that are connected by n node-disjoint (except for S and R) bi-directional wires. Out of these n wires, the adversary can control at most t wires (of its choice) in Byzantine fashion. In this setting, our goal is to design a message transmission protocol Π that assures the following two conditions hold: (1) by the end of the protocol Π, R gets the correct message m transmitted by S without any error (perfect reliability), and (2) the adversary learns no information about m, whatsoever, in information theoretic sense (perfect secrecy). Protocols that satisfy these two conditions are known as the Perfectly Secure Message Transmission (PSMT) protocols. However, out of the n wires that exist, if some number of wires say ns, fortunately, happen to be synchronous (serendipitous synchrony) then we ask under what conditions do PSMT protocols tolerating t-Byzantine faults exist. In the literature, it is known that, if either ns > 2t or n > 3t then PSMT protocols trivially exist. Therefore, we consider the case where we have at most 2t synchronous wires (i.e., ns ≤ 2t) and at most 3t wires overall (i.e., n ≤ 3t). Interestingly, we prove that in this case, no PSMT protocol exists. This concludes that, in designing PSMT protocols (tolerating the given fixed number of faults), either (serendipitous) synchronous wires alone are sufficient or we get absolutely no extra advantage of a wire being synchronous over asynchronous.","PeriodicalId":346177,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3288599.3288612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In a distributed network, we consider two special nodes called the sender S and the receiver R that are connected by n node-disjoint (except for S and R) bi-directional wires. Out of these n wires, the adversary can control at most t wires (of its choice) in Byzantine fashion. In this setting, our goal is to design a message transmission protocol Π that assures the following two conditions hold: (1) by the end of the protocol Π, R gets the correct message m transmitted by S without any error (perfect reliability), and (2) the adversary learns no information about m, whatsoever, in information theoretic sense (perfect secrecy). Protocols that satisfy these two conditions are known as the Perfectly Secure Message Transmission (PSMT) protocols. However, out of the n wires that exist, if some number of wires say ns, fortunately, happen to be synchronous (serendipitous synchrony) then we ask under what conditions do PSMT protocols tolerating t-Byzantine faults exist. In the literature, it is known that, if either ns > 2t or n > 3t then PSMT protocols trivially exist. Therefore, we consider the case where we have at most 2t synchronous wires (i.e., ns ≤ 2t) and at most 3t wires overall (i.e., n ≤ 3t). Interestingly, we prove that in this case, no PSMT protocol exists. This concludes that, in designing PSMT protocols (tolerating the given fixed number of faults), either (serendipitous) synchronous wires alone are sufficient or we get absolutely no extra advantage of a wire being synchronous over asynchronous.
在部分同步网络上完全安全的消息传输
在分布式网络中,我们考虑两个特殊的节点,称为发送方S和接收方R,它们由n个节点不相交的(除了S和R)双向导线连接。在这n条线中,对手可以以拜占庭式的方式控制最多t条线(其选择)。在此设置中,我们的目标是设计一个消息传输协议Π,该协议确保以下两个条件成立:(1)在协议Π结束时,R获得由S传输的正确消息m,没有任何错误(完全可靠),以及(2)对手不了解关于m的任何信息,在信息论意义上(完全保密)。满足这两个条件的协议称为完全安全消息传输(PSMT)协议。然而,在存在的n条线路中,如果一些线路说n条,幸运的是,碰巧是同步的(意外同步),那么我们问在什么条件下PSMT协议容忍t-Byzantine错误存在。在文献中,已知如果ns > 2t或n > 3t,则PSMT协议平凡存在。因此,我们考虑最多有2t条同步线(即ns≤2t)和最多3t条总线(即n≤3t)的情况。有趣的是,我们证明在这种情况下,不存在PSMT协议。由此得出的结论是,在设计PSMT协议(容忍给定的固定数量的故障)时,要么(偶然的)单独的同步连接就足够了,要么我们绝对没有获得同步连接优于异步连接的额外优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信