Thai amber: insights into early diatom history?

V. Girard, Simona Saint Martin, E. Buffetaut, J. Martin, D. Néraudeau, D. Peyrot, G. Roghi, E. Ragazzi, V. Suteethorn
{"title":"Thai amber: insights into early diatom history?","authors":"V. Girard, Simona Saint Martin, E. Buffetaut, J. Martin, D. Néraudeau, D. Peyrot, G. Roghi, E. Ragazzi, V. Suteethorn","doi":"10.1051/bsgf/2020028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The origin of the diatoms still remains enigmatic. Their fossil record is scarce until the Late Cretaceous and great divergences exist between molecular data and the earliest fossil evidence. While molecular data indicate an origin during the Triassic or Early Jurassic, early fossil evidence is only from the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous. The discovery of diatoms in French mid-Cretaceous amber by the end of the 2000s already suggested a potential bias in the diatom fossil record as it made older many diatom lineages, the record of which hitherto began at the end of the Cretaceous. The Jurassic/Early Cretaceous fossil record of diatoms is extremely sparse and any new occurrence is important for retracing the evolutionary, palaeogeographical and palaeoenvironmental history of diatoms. Thai amber has yielded a new diatom specimen that has been attributed to the genus Hemiaulus. Fossil assemblages and sedimentological data indicate that Thai amber and its Hemiaulus specimen are Late Jurassic in age. This discovery represents the oldest hitherto known specimen of Hemiaulus and so extends the fossil record of the bipolar diatoms and of the genus Hemiaulus by several dozens of millions of years and brings closer the fossil evidence and molecular data (that estimated an origin of the bipolar diatoms about 150 Ma ago). It reinforces the hypothesis of a pre-Cretaceous fossil diatom records and also supports an origin of the diatoms in shallow coastal environments.","PeriodicalId":202681,"journal":{"name":"BSGF - Earth Sciences Bulletin","volume":"260 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BSGF - Earth Sciences Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/bsgf/2020028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The origin of the diatoms still remains enigmatic. Their fossil record is scarce until the Late Cretaceous and great divergences exist between molecular data and the earliest fossil evidence. While molecular data indicate an origin during the Triassic or Early Jurassic, early fossil evidence is only from the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous. The discovery of diatoms in French mid-Cretaceous amber by the end of the 2000s already suggested a potential bias in the diatom fossil record as it made older many diatom lineages, the record of which hitherto began at the end of the Cretaceous. The Jurassic/Early Cretaceous fossil record of diatoms is extremely sparse and any new occurrence is important for retracing the evolutionary, palaeogeographical and palaeoenvironmental history of diatoms. Thai amber has yielded a new diatom specimen that has been attributed to the genus Hemiaulus. Fossil assemblages and sedimentological data indicate that Thai amber and its Hemiaulus specimen are Late Jurassic in age. This discovery represents the oldest hitherto known specimen of Hemiaulus and so extends the fossil record of the bipolar diatoms and of the genus Hemiaulus by several dozens of millions of years and brings closer the fossil evidence and molecular data (that estimated an origin of the bipolar diatoms about 150 Ma ago). It reinforces the hypothesis of a pre-Cretaceous fossil diatom records and also supports an origin of the diatoms in shallow coastal environments.
泰国琥珀:早期硅藻历史的洞见?
硅藻的起源仍然是个谜。直到晚白垩纪,它们的化石记录都很稀少,分子数据和最早的化石证据之间存在很大的分歧。虽然分子数据表明其起源于三叠纪或早侏罗世,但早期化石证据仅来自晚侏罗世-早白垩纪。2000年代末,在法国白垩纪中期琥珀中发现了硅藻,这表明硅藻化石记录可能存在偏差,因为它使许多硅藻谱系更加古老,而迄今为止的记录始于白垩纪末期。侏罗纪/早白垩世硅藻的化石记录极为稀少,任何新的硅藻出现都对回溯硅藻的进化、古地理和古环境历史具有重要意义。泰国琥珀发现了一个新的硅藻标本,属于半硅藻属。化石组合和沉积学资料表明,泰国琥珀及其半爪标本的时代为晚侏罗世。这一发现代表了迄今为止已知的最古老的半硅藻标本,因此将双极硅藻和半藻属的化石记录延长了数千万年,并使化石证据和分子数据更接近(估计双极硅藻的起源约为150 Ma)。它加强了白垩纪前硅藻化石记录的假设,也支持了硅藻在浅海海岸环境中的起源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信