Does repurchase timing matter in promotional framing effect?

Bo Wang
{"title":"Does repurchase timing matter in promotional framing effect?","authors":"Bo Wang","doi":"10.1108/mip-03-2022-0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAlthough the evidence exists for the effect of promotional frame on repurchase intention, it is unclear whether the timing of repurchase can moderate the effect. In this paper, three experiments were conducted to answer this question.Design/methodology/approachIn Experiment 1, a 2 (framing: bundle vs. gift) × 2 (repurchase target: focal vs. supplementary) × 2 (timing: short vs. long) between-subjects design was used. In Experiment 2, an identical design was used except that repurchase target being the within-subjects factor. In Experiment 3, the design was based on that of Experiment 2 and brand was added a between-subjects factor.FindingsExperiment 1 showed that, with a short interval, repurchase intention under gift frame was higher than that under bundle frame. With a long interval, there was no significant difference between the gift and bundle frames. Experiment 2, however, indicated no effects for expensive products. Experiment 3 showed that brand (private versus national brand) moderate the interaction between framing, repurchase target and timing. Particularly, for private brand, no significant comparisons were found; for national brand, repurchase intention for the focal product was significantly higher than for the supplementary product, but only under the conditions of long interval and gift frame (rather than bundle frame).Originality/valueTaken together, findings from the current study contributes to the literature by showing for the first time that repurchase timing can moderate the promotional frame effect (i.e. higher repurchase intention under gift framing relative to bundle framing occurs in the short interval but not long interval) and that brand type can moderate the joint effects of framing, timing and repurchase target (i.e. national brand, rather than private brand, paired with long interval and gift frame results in higher repurchase intention for the focal product). The findings provide marketers with important knowledge in terms of how to adjust a promotional frame depending on when consumers repurchase a product and whether the product has a private or national brand.","PeriodicalId":402197,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-03-2022-0134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeAlthough the evidence exists for the effect of promotional frame on repurchase intention, it is unclear whether the timing of repurchase can moderate the effect. In this paper, three experiments were conducted to answer this question.Design/methodology/approachIn Experiment 1, a 2 (framing: bundle vs. gift) × 2 (repurchase target: focal vs. supplementary) × 2 (timing: short vs. long) between-subjects design was used. In Experiment 2, an identical design was used except that repurchase target being the within-subjects factor. In Experiment 3, the design was based on that of Experiment 2 and brand was added a between-subjects factor.FindingsExperiment 1 showed that, with a short interval, repurchase intention under gift frame was higher than that under bundle frame. With a long interval, there was no significant difference between the gift and bundle frames. Experiment 2, however, indicated no effects for expensive products. Experiment 3 showed that brand (private versus national brand) moderate the interaction between framing, repurchase target and timing. Particularly, for private brand, no significant comparisons were found; for national brand, repurchase intention for the focal product was significantly higher than for the supplementary product, but only under the conditions of long interval and gift frame (rather than bundle frame).Originality/valueTaken together, findings from the current study contributes to the literature by showing for the first time that repurchase timing can moderate the promotional frame effect (i.e. higher repurchase intention under gift framing relative to bundle framing occurs in the short interval but not long interval) and that brand type can moderate the joint effects of framing, timing and repurchase target (i.e. national brand, rather than private brand, paired with long interval and gift frame results in higher repurchase intention for the focal product). The findings provide marketers with important knowledge in terms of how to adjust a promotional frame depending on when consumers repurchase a product and whether the product has a private or national brand.
回购时机对促销框架效应有影响吗?
目的虽然有证据表明促销框架对回购意愿的影响,但回购时机是否能调节这种影响尚不清楚。本文通过三个实验来回答这个问题。设计/方法/方法实验1采用2(框架:捆绑与礼物)× 2(回购目标:重点与补充)× 2(时间:短与长)受试者间设计。在实验2中,除了回购目标为被试内因素外,采用相同的设计。实验3在实验2的基础上进行设计,并加入被试间因素品牌。实验1表明,在较短的时间间隔内,礼品框架下的回购意愿高于捆绑框架下的回购意愿。在较长的时间间隔内,礼品和捆绑框架之间没有显著差异。然而,实验2表明,对昂贵的产品没有效果。实验3显示品牌(自主品牌与国家品牌)对框架、再购买目标和时间的交互作用有调节作用。特别是,对于自有品牌,没有发现显著的比较;对于民族品牌而言,主打产品的再购买意愿显著高于辅助性产品,但仅在间隔时间较长且采用礼品框架(而非捆绑框架)的情况下。综上所述,本研究的研究结果首次表明,回购时机可以调节促销框架效应(即礼品框架下相对于捆绑框架下的更高回购意愿在短间隔而不是长间隔出现),品牌类型可以调节框架、时机和回购目标(即国家品牌,而不是自有品牌)的联合效应。搭配较长的间隔和礼框,焦点产品的再购买意愿更高)。这些发现为营销人员提供了重要的知识,告诉他们如何根据消费者何时再次购买产品,以及该产品是私人品牌还是国家品牌,来调整促销框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信