Comparison of Earliest Deadline First and Rate Monotonic Scheduling in Polling Server

Zeyhan Aliyah, R. M. R. Pambudhi, Abdan Hafidh Ahnafi, H. Nuha, Sidik Prabowo
{"title":"Comparison of Earliest Deadline First and Rate Monotonic Scheduling in Polling Server","authors":"Zeyhan Aliyah, R. M. R. Pambudhi, Abdan Hafidh Ahnafi, H. Nuha, Sidik Prabowo","doi":"10.1109/ICoICT49345.2020.9166334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scheduling is an activity to complete the process on a real-time system. In this project, an analysis aimed to evaluate the scheduling of EDF and RMS algorithms in the case of a polling server. A number of comparisons were made to evaluate which algorithm was better for real-time scheduling as seen from the average of the Turn Around Time (TAT), Waiting Time (WT), and Utilization. From the experiments carried out, EDF produced an average of TAT values at a faster time compared to RMS. In other words, the scheduling of EDF will work faster than RMS. Meanwhile, the utilization value of the two algorithms produced the same results.","PeriodicalId":113108,"journal":{"name":"2020 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT49345.2020.9166334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Scheduling is an activity to complete the process on a real-time system. In this project, an analysis aimed to evaluate the scheduling of EDF and RMS algorithms in the case of a polling server. A number of comparisons were made to evaluate which algorithm was better for real-time scheduling as seen from the average of the Turn Around Time (TAT), Waiting Time (WT), and Utilization. From the experiments carried out, EDF produced an average of TAT values at a faster time compared to RMS. In other words, the scheduling of EDF will work faster than RMS. Meanwhile, the utilization value of the two algorithms produced the same results.
轮询服务器中最早期限优先调度与速率单调调度的比较
调度是在实时系统中完成进程的一种活动。在这个项目中,分析旨在评估在轮询服务器的情况下EDF和RMS算法的调度。从周转时间(TAT)、等待时间(WT)和利用率的平均值来看,我们进行了许多比较,以评估哪种算法更适合实时调度。从所进行的实验中,EDF比RMS更快地产生了TAT值的平均值。换句话说,EDF的调度将比RMS更快。同时,两种算法的利用值产生相同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信