Relationships between founder background, issue severity, and innovation in social entrepreneurship initiatives

M. London, Steven Dell’Amore, Mallory Rothstein, Katie Stockhammer-DeSimone
{"title":"Relationships between founder background, issue severity, and innovation in social entrepreneurship initiatives","authors":"M. London, Steven Dell’Amore, Mallory Rothstein, Katie Stockhammer-DeSimone","doi":"10.1504/IJSEI.2014.064095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the characteristics of social entrepreneurship initiatives that were recognised by major foundations and media for their accomplishments, and it explored relationships between these characteristics and outcomes. Organisational theory-based hypotheses predicted that more experienced entrepreneurs and more severe problems will produce more innovative methods and generate more socially favourable outcomes. The sample consisted of the 121 social entrepreneurship initiatives. Older initiatives addressed more severe problems and had more favourable outcomes. Initiatives that were more innovative were more complex and had greater impact. Women were founders of older enterprises and produced greater impact. Problem severity and using new methods and technologies were related to more positive impact, especially for women founders. The results are discussed in terms of understanding factors that contribute to an initiative reaching the stage of world-wide recognition and the need for research to understand processes that contribute to innovative solutions and positive outcomes.","PeriodicalId":187252,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation","volume":"26 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSEI.2014.064095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study examined the characteristics of social entrepreneurship initiatives that were recognised by major foundations and media for their accomplishments, and it explored relationships between these characteristics and outcomes. Organisational theory-based hypotheses predicted that more experienced entrepreneurs and more severe problems will produce more innovative methods and generate more socially favourable outcomes. The sample consisted of the 121 social entrepreneurship initiatives. Older initiatives addressed more severe problems and had more favourable outcomes. Initiatives that were more innovative were more complex and had greater impact. Women were founders of older enterprises and produced greater impact. Problem severity and using new methods and technologies were related to more positive impact, especially for women founders. The results are discussed in terms of understanding factors that contribute to an initiative reaching the stage of world-wide recognition and the need for research to understand processes that contribute to innovative solutions and positive outcomes.
创始人背景、问题严重性与社会创业创新之间的关系
本研究考察了被主要基金会和媒体认可的社会创业项目的特点,并探讨了这些特点与成果之间的关系。基于组织理论的假设预测,经验更丰富的企业家和更严重的问题将产生更创新的方法,并产生更有利于社会的结果。样本包括121个社会创业项目。旧的倡议解决了更严重的问题,产生了更有利的结果。更具创新性的计划更复杂,影响也更大。女性是老企业的创始人,产生了更大的影响。问题的严重性和新方法和新技术的使用与更积极的影响有关,尤其是对女性创始人而言。研究结果从以下方面进行了讨论:了解有助于一项倡议达到世界范围认可阶段的因素,以及需要进行研究以了解有助于创新解决方案和积极成果的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信