Prospective Evaluation of Serial Protein Biomarker Measurements in Sepsis-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

P. Yang, E. Iffrig, F. Harris, G. Martin, A. Esper
{"title":"Prospective Evaluation of Serial Protein Biomarker Measurements in Sepsis-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome","authors":"P. Yang, E. Iffrig, F. Harris, G. Martin, A. Esper","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a3824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE: Protein biomarkers including soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE), angiopoietin-2 (Ang- 2), and surfactant protein-D (SP-D) have been studied for diagnosis or prognostication in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, prior studies of ARDS biomarkers often included heterogeneous populations, and rarely examined serial measurements. Our aim was to determine the association between serially measured sRAGE, Ang-2, and SP-D levels and ARDS development in patients with sepsis. METHODS: Adult patients admitted to the medical ICU at Grady Memorial Hospital within 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis were enrolled into this prospective observational cohort study within 48 hours of ICU admission. Patients who already had ARDS at the time of screening were excluded. After obtaining informed consent, serial plasma samples were collected on day 1, 2, and 3 of enrollment, and were analyzed for sRAGE, Ang-2, and SP-D levels using ELISA. The patients were followed for up to 28 days for relevant clinical characteristics and outcomes. The primary outcome was ARDS development according to the Berlin Definition. The secondary outcome was mortality. Pulmonary sepsis was defined as the primary infection being pneumonia (including COVID19) or aspiration pneumonia. The biomarker levels and their changes from day 1 to days 2/3 were compared between those who developed ARDS versus those who did not. RESULTS: Among 80 patients with sepsis enrolled between September 1, 2020 and June 22, 2021, 15 patients (18.8%) developed ARDS and 65 patients (81.3%) did not. ARDS patients had higher proportions of pulmonary sepsis (14/15 [93.3%] vs. 30/65 [46.2%], p=0.001) and COVID19 (7/15 [46.7%] vs. 7/65 [10.8%], p=0.003) compared to non-ARDS patients. ARDS patients had higher SP-D levels on days 1 and 2, and had a greater increase in sRAGE levels from day 1 to day 3, compared to non-ARDS patients (Figure 1A- 1B). Within the ARDS group, those who died had higher sRAGE levels on day 1 compared to those who survived (Figure 1C). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, ARDS patients had higher SP-D and a greater increase in sRAGE over time compared to non- ARDS patients. Non-survivors of ARDS also had higher sRAGE compared to survivors. Our findings suggest that early serial biomarker measurements may be useful for identifying sepsis patients at risk of developing ARDS and adverse clinical outcomes, and for risk stratifying sepsis patients in ARDS clinical trials focused on early therapeutics and prevention. Larger studies are needed for more detailed analyses and confirmation of these findings.","PeriodicalId":275484,"journal":{"name":"C24. ARDS: BASIC SCIENCE TO THE BEDSIDE","volume":"196 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C24. ARDS: BASIC SCIENCE TO THE BEDSIDE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a3824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RATIONALE: Protein biomarkers including soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE), angiopoietin-2 (Ang- 2), and surfactant protein-D (SP-D) have been studied for diagnosis or prognostication in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, prior studies of ARDS biomarkers often included heterogeneous populations, and rarely examined serial measurements. Our aim was to determine the association between serially measured sRAGE, Ang-2, and SP-D levels and ARDS development in patients with sepsis. METHODS: Adult patients admitted to the medical ICU at Grady Memorial Hospital within 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis were enrolled into this prospective observational cohort study within 48 hours of ICU admission. Patients who already had ARDS at the time of screening were excluded. After obtaining informed consent, serial plasma samples were collected on day 1, 2, and 3 of enrollment, and were analyzed for sRAGE, Ang-2, and SP-D levels using ELISA. The patients were followed for up to 28 days for relevant clinical characteristics and outcomes. The primary outcome was ARDS development according to the Berlin Definition. The secondary outcome was mortality. Pulmonary sepsis was defined as the primary infection being pneumonia (including COVID19) or aspiration pneumonia. The biomarker levels and their changes from day 1 to days 2/3 were compared between those who developed ARDS versus those who did not. RESULTS: Among 80 patients with sepsis enrolled between September 1, 2020 and June 22, 2021, 15 patients (18.8%) developed ARDS and 65 patients (81.3%) did not. ARDS patients had higher proportions of pulmonary sepsis (14/15 [93.3%] vs. 30/65 [46.2%], p=0.001) and COVID19 (7/15 [46.7%] vs. 7/65 [10.8%], p=0.003) compared to non-ARDS patients. ARDS patients had higher SP-D levels on days 1 and 2, and had a greater increase in sRAGE levels from day 1 to day 3, compared to non-ARDS patients (Figure 1A- 1B). Within the ARDS group, those who died had higher sRAGE levels on day 1 compared to those who survived (Figure 1C). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, ARDS patients had higher SP-D and a greater increase in sRAGE over time compared to non- ARDS patients. Non-survivors of ARDS also had higher sRAGE compared to survivors. Our findings suggest that early serial biomarker measurements may be useful for identifying sepsis patients at risk of developing ARDS and adverse clinical outcomes, and for risk stratifying sepsis patients in ARDS clinical trials focused on early therapeutics and prevention. Larger studies are needed for more detailed analyses and confirmation of these findings.
脓毒症引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征系列蛋白生物标志物测定的前瞻性评价
理论基础:蛋白质生物标志物包括晚期糖基化终产物可溶性受体(sRAGE)、血管生成素-2 (Ang- 2)和表面活性剂蛋白- d (SP-D)已被研究用于急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的诊断或预后。然而,先前对ARDS生物标志物的研究通常包括异质人群,很少检查连续测量。我们的目的是确定连续测量的sRAGE、Ang-2和SP-D水平与败血症患者ARDS发展之间的关系。方法:格雷迪纪念医院脓毒症诊断后72小时内入住内科ICU的成年患者被纳入该前瞻性观察队列研究。在筛查时已经患有ARDS的患者被排除在外。在获得知情同意后,在入组的第1、2和3天收集连续血浆样本,并使用ELISA分析sRAGE、Ang-2和SP-D水平。对患者进行了长达28天的相关临床特征和结果随访。根据柏林定义,主要结局是ARDS的发展。次要结局是死亡率。肺脓毒症定义为原发感染为肺炎(包括covid - 19)或吸入性肺炎。比较发生ARDS组与未发生ARDS组的生物标志物水平及其从第1天到第2/3天的变化。结果:在2020年9月1日至2021年6月22日期间入组的80例败血症患者中,15例(18.8%)发生ARDS, 65例(81.3%)未发生ARDS。ARDS患者肺脓毒症(14/15[93.3%]比30/65 [46.2%],p=0.001)和covid - 19(7/15[46.7%]比7/65 [10.8%],p=0.003)的比例高于非ARDS患者。与非ARDS患者相比,ARDS患者在第1天和第2天的SP-D水平较高,从第1天到第3天的sRAGE水平也有较大的增加(图1A- 1B)。在ARDS组中,死亡患者在第1天的sRAGE水平高于存活患者(图1C)。结论:在本分析中,与非ARDS患者相比,ARDS患者随着时间的推移具有更高的SP-D和更大的sRAGE增加。非ARDS幸存者的sRAGE也高于幸存者。我们的研究结果表明,早期系列生物标志物测量可能有助于识别有发生ARDS风险和不良临床结果的脓毒症患者,并有助于在ARDS临床试验中对脓毒症患者进行风险分层,重点是早期治疗和预防。需要更大规模的研究来更详细地分析和证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信