Plant Disease Identification on Real-World Data using Deep Learning: A Comparative Study

Abhimanyu Sethi, S. V, Jennifer Raniani J
{"title":"Plant Disease Identification on Real-World Data using Deep Learning: A Comparative Study","authors":"Abhimanyu Sethi, S. V, Jennifer Raniani J","doi":"10.1109/ICCCT53315.2021.9711781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correct and timely identification of disease in plants, especially for a country like India, where agriculture continues to serve as a cornerstone of its economy, is an indispensable tool demanding our solicitousness. Recently, researchers have started to employ autonomous real-time systems involving deep learning techniques for this purpose. However, the wide va-riety of heterogeneous diseases affecting crop yield continues to prove itself a mammoth task for farmers and stymies the researchers. The majority of the current state-of-the-art models utilize datasets like Plant Village, consisting of leaf images taken in a controlled lab environment, which do not serve as accurate representative data of the real-world scenario. Moreover, the effectiveness of state-of-the-art models like EfficientNetLite, which provided notable improvements in accuracy for similar deep learning applications, remains untested on plant disease datasets. Hence, an exhaustive study on the performance of various state-of-the-art models with varied training conditions on real-time datasets like PlantDoc is imperative to further this area of research. In this paper, we have explored state-of-the-art CNNs like InceptionResNet, EfficientNetLite_0, and VGG-19, under various parameter settings, image augmentations techniques, and loss functions on the real-time PlantDoc dataset. We have evaluated and presented a comparative analysis of the exhaustive combinations and performances gauged by accuracy, top-5 accuracy, F1 scores, and other inferences drawn from training and testing all these networks on 27 different classes of crop diseases. We infer that EfficientNetLite proved to be a most effective architecture, especially given its relatively smaller size. EfficientNetLite coupled with the focal loss function and Albumentaions augmentation library yielded the best results with an accuracy of 70.71%, mean F1-score as 0.7, and 95.57% top-5 accuracy, on a test set congruent with real-world relevance.","PeriodicalId":162171,"journal":{"name":"2021 4th International Conference on Computing and Communications Technologies (ICCCT)","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 4th International Conference on Computing and Communications Technologies (ICCCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCT53315.2021.9711781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Correct and timely identification of disease in plants, especially for a country like India, where agriculture continues to serve as a cornerstone of its economy, is an indispensable tool demanding our solicitousness. Recently, researchers have started to employ autonomous real-time systems involving deep learning techniques for this purpose. However, the wide va-riety of heterogeneous diseases affecting crop yield continues to prove itself a mammoth task for farmers and stymies the researchers. The majority of the current state-of-the-art models utilize datasets like Plant Village, consisting of leaf images taken in a controlled lab environment, which do not serve as accurate representative data of the real-world scenario. Moreover, the effectiveness of state-of-the-art models like EfficientNetLite, which provided notable improvements in accuracy for similar deep learning applications, remains untested on plant disease datasets. Hence, an exhaustive study on the performance of various state-of-the-art models with varied training conditions on real-time datasets like PlantDoc is imperative to further this area of research. In this paper, we have explored state-of-the-art CNNs like InceptionResNet, EfficientNetLite_0, and VGG-19, under various parameter settings, image augmentations techniques, and loss functions on the real-time PlantDoc dataset. We have evaluated and presented a comparative analysis of the exhaustive combinations and performances gauged by accuracy, top-5 accuracy, F1 scores, and other inferences drawn from training and testing all these networks on 27 different classes of crop diseases. We infer that EfficientNetLite proved to be a most effective architecture, especially given its relatively smaller size. EfficientNetLite coupled with the focal loss function and Albumentaions augmentation library yielded the best results with an accuracy of 70.71%, mean F1-score as 0.7, and 95.57% top-5 accuracy, on a test set congruent with real-world relevance.
利用深度学习对真实世界数据进行植物病害识别的比较研究
正确和及时地识别植物中的疾病,特别是对像印度这样农业继续作为其经济基石的国家来说,是需要我们关心的不可或缺的工具。最近,研究人员已经开始为此目的使用涉及深度学习技术的自主实时系统。然而,影响作物产量的各种各样的异质疾病继续证明自己是农民的一项艰巨任务,并阻碍了研究人员。目前大多数最先进的模型都使用像Plant Village这样的数据集,这些数据集由在受控实验室环境中拍摄的叶子图像组成,不能作为真实世界场景的准确代表性数据。此外,最先进的模型(如EfficientNetLite)的有效性尚未在植物病害数据集上进行测试,尽管它为类似的深度学习应用程序提供了显著的准确性提高。因此,对各种最先进的模型在诸如PlantDoc等实时数据集上具有不同训练条件的性能进行详尽的研究对于进一步研究这一领域至关重要。在本文中,我们在实时PlantDoc数据集上探索了各种参数设置、图像增强技术和损失函数下的最先进的cnn,如InceptionResNet、EfficientNetLite_0和VGG-19。我们对所有这些网络在27种不同类型作物病害上的训练和测试得出的准确性、前5名准确性、F1分数和其他推论进行了评估和比较分析。我们推断,高效率netlite被证明是最有效的架构,特别是考虑到它相对较小的尺寸。在与真实世界相关的测试集上,effentnetlite结合焦点损失函数和Albumentaions增强库获得了最佳结果,准确率为70.71%,平均f1得分为0.7,前5名准确率为95.57%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信