Machine Learning for Corporate Default Risk: Multi-Period Prediction, Frailty Correlation, Loan Portfolios, and Tail Probabilities

Fabio Sigrist, N. Leuenberger
{"title":"Machine Learning for Corporate Default Risk: Multi-Period Prediction, Frailty Correlation, Loan Portfolios, and Tail Probabilities","authors":"Fabio Sigrist, N. Leuenberger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3938972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use machine learning methods for modeling multi-period corporate default probabilities and obtain higher prediction accuracy compared to linear models with the differences being larger for longer prediction horizons. Overall, tree-boosting has the highest prediction accuracy. In addition, we introduce a novel hybrid econometric-machine learning model combining tree-boosting with a latent frailty model. This ``LaGaBoost frailty model\" results in more accurate predictions of upper tails of portfolio losses compared to both a linear frailty model and machine learning methods ignoring frailty correlation. We also investigate the reasons and find various explanations for the observed differences in prediction accuracy.","PeriodicalId":331807,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3938972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We use machine learning methods for modeling multi-period corporate default probabilities and obtain higher prediction accuracy compared to linear models with the differences being larger for longer prediction horizons. Overall, tree-boosting has the highest prediction accuracy. In addition, we introduce a novel hybrid econometric-machine learning model combining tree-boosting with a latent frailty model. This ``LaGaBoost frailty model" results in more accurate predictions of upper tails of portfolio losses compared to both a linear frailty model and machine learning methods ignoring frailty correlation. We also investigate the reasons and find various explanations for the observed differences in prediction accuracy.
企业违约风险的机器学习:多期预测、脆弱性相关性、贷款组合和尾部概率
我们使用机器学习方法对多周期企业违约概率进行建模,与线性模型相比,我们获得了更高的预测精度,并且在更长的预测范围内差异更大。总体而言,树助推具有最高的预测精度。此外,我们还引入了一种新的混合计量经济学-机器学习模型,该模型结合了树促进和潜在脆弱性模型。与线性脆弱性模型和忽略脆弱性相关性的机器学习方法相比,这种“LaGaBoost脆弱性模型”可以更准确地预测投资组合损失的上尾。我们还研究了预测精度差异的原因,并找到了各种解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信