Technique/Discourse: When Bergson Invented His Cinematograph

Maria Tortajada
{"title":"Technique/Discourse: When Bergson Invented His Cinematograph","authors":"Maria Tortajada","doi":"10.7202/1027445AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “cinematographic model of thought” was developed by Bergson in Creative Evolution (1907) after his 1902-1903 lectures at the College de France. His appropriation of this device of modernity certainly didn't go unnoticed. Throughout the twentieth century, Bergsonian discourse produced frequently opposing positions on the cinema, making it necessary for the film historian to question the status of Bergson’s cinematographic dispositive. This dispositive, which strictly belongs to philosophical discourse, refers to equipment and procedures whose mechanism is quite recognizable and isn’t solely confined to the device invented by Lumiere. Scholars thus need to confront the technical dimension of this dispositive if they are to examine its very singular character. What makes Bergson’s dispositive technical? How does the shift occur from the technical reference to its appropriation by discourse in demonstrative strategies that transform its value? Starting from this case study, this article seeks to address the following question as directly as possible : what does technique become once it enters (philosophical) discourse? Borrowing from the history of techniques outside the specialized literature on cinema, the article also attempts to redefine the web of relations between discourse and technical fact. Finally, it raises the issue of what may be called a user discourse with respect to specialized discourse, emphasizing the predisposition of any discourse for an osmosis of concepts which the epistemology of viewing dispositives can account for.","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1027445AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The “cinematographic model of thought” was developed by Bergson in Creative Evolution (1907) after his 1902-1903 lectures at the College de France. His appropriation of this device of modernity certainly didn't go unnoticed. Throughout the twentieth century, Bergsonian discourse produced frequently opposing positions on the cinema, making it necessary for the film historian to question the status of Bergson’s cinematographic dispositive. This dispositive, which strictly belongs to philosophical discourse, refers to equipment and procedures whose mechanism is quite recognizable and isn’t solely confined to the device invented by Lumiere. Scholars thus need to confront the technical dimension of this dispositive if they are to examine its very singular character. What makes Bergson’s dispositive technical? How does the shift occur from the technical reference to its appropriation by discourse in demonstrative strategies that transform its value? Starting from this case study, this article seeks to address the following question as directly as possible : what does technique become once it enters (philosophical) discourse? Borrowing from the history of techniques outside the specialized literature on cinema, the article also attempts to redefine the web of relations between discourse and technical fact. Finally, it raises the issue of what may be called a user discourse with respect to specialized discourse, emphasizing the predisposition of any discourse for an osmosis of concepts which the epistemology of viewing dispositives can account for.
技术/话语:当柏格森发明了他的电影摄影术
“电影思维模式”是柏格森1902-1903年在法兰西学院的讲座后在《创造性进化》(1907)中提出的。他对这种现代性手段的挪用当然不会被忽视。在整个二十世纪,柏格森的话语在电影上经常产生对立的立场,这使得电影历史学家有必要质疑柏格森的电影决定性的地位。这是一个严格意义上属于哲学话语的决定,指的是其机制具有相当可辨性的设备和程序,而不仅仅局限于卢米埃尔发明的装置。因此,学者们如果要考察其独特的特征,就需要面对这一决定的技术层面。是什么让柏格森的决定论具有技术性?这种转变是如何发生的,从技术参考到话语在改变其价值的论证策略中的挪用?从这个案例研究开始,本文试图尽可能直接地解决以下问题:一旦技术进入(哲学)话语,它会变成什么?借助电影专业文献之外的技术史,本文也试图重新定义话语与技术事实之间的关系网络。最后,它提出了关于专业话语的所谓用户话语的问题,强调了任何话语对概念渗透的倾向,这是观察否定性的认识论可以解释的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信