The Dynamics of Backlash Online: Anonymous and the Battle for WikiLeaks

J. Earl, Jessica L. Beyer
{"title":"The Dynamics of Backlash Online: Anonymous and the Battle for WikiLeaks","authors":"J. Earl, Jessica L. Beyer","doi":"10.1108/S0163-786X20140000037007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nWe analyze reactions to the U.S. government-led repression of WikiLeaks in late 2010 by actors such as Anonymous and the Pirate Parties to argue that the potential for backlash, which has been so prominent offline, is also a potential repercussion of repression online. In doing so, we use existing research to identify different ways in which bystanders might be pulled into conflicts, and examine our case for evidence of any of these forms of backlash. We also hypothesize that the net observed effect of repression is really the result of competing and/or amplifying backlash and deterrence effects; when this net effect is in favor of backlash, we call it a “net backlash effect” to indicate that there was more backlash than deterrence. We argue that net backlash occurs when repression recruits more bystanders into a conflict than it is able to deter in terms of already active participants. We also argue that backlash is a very likely outcome when Internet activism is repressed.","PeriodicalId":314175,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X20140000037007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract We analyze reactions to the U.S. government-led repression of WikiLeaks in late 2010 by actors such as Anonymous and the Pirate Parties to argue that the potential for backlash, which has been so prominent offline, is also a potential repercussion of repression online. In doing so, we use existing research to identify different ways in which bystanders might be pulled into conflicts, and examine our case for evidence of any of these forms of backlash. We also hypothesize that the net observed effect of repression is really the result of competing and/or amplifying backlash and deterrence effects; when this net effect is in favor of backlash, we call it a “net backlash effect” to indicate that there was more backlash than deterrence. We argue that net backlash occurs when repression recruits more bystanders into a conflict than it is able to deter in terms of already active participants. We also argue that backlash is a very likely outcome when Internet activism is repressed.
网上反弹的动态:匿名者和维基解密之战
我们分析了“匿名者”(Anonymous)和“海盗党”(Pirate party)等组织对2010年末美国政府主导的维基解密(WikiLeaks)镇压的反应,认为这种潜在的反弹在线下如此突出,也可能是在线镇压的潜在反响。在此过程中,我们利用现有的研究来确定旁观者可能被卷入冲突的不同方式,并检查我们的案例,寻找任何这些形式的反弹的证据。我们还假设,观察到的抑制效应实际上是竞争和/或放大反弹和威慑效应的结果;当这种净效应有利于反弹时,我们称之为“净反弹效应”,表明反弹大于威慑。我们认为,当镇压将更多的旁观者招募到冲突中,而不是能够阻止已经活跃的参与者时,就会发生净反弹。我们还认为,当互联网激进主义受到压制时,反弹是很可能的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信