{"title":"Architecture independent analysis of sorting and list ranking on the hierarchical PRAM model","authors":"T. Heywood, S. Ranka","doi":"10.1109/FMPC.1992.234932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors consider the performance of sorting and list ranking on the hierarchical parallel random access machine (H-PRAM), a model of computation which represents general degrees of locality (neighborhoods of activity), considering communication and synchronization simultaneously. The sorting result gives a significant improvement over that for the LPRAM (local-memory PRAM, i.e. unit-size neighborhoods), matches the best known hypercube algorithms when the H-PRAM's latency parameter l(P) is set to log P, and matches the best possible mesh algorithm when l(P)= square root P. The list ranking algorithm demonstrates fundamental limitations of the H-PRAM for nonoblivious problems which have linear-time sequential algorithms.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":117789,"journal":{"name":"[Proceedings 1992] The Fourth Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Proceedings 1992] The Fourth Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMPC.1992.234932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The authors consider the performance of sorting and list ranking on the hierarchical parallel random access machine (H-PRAM), a model of computation which represents general degrees of locality (neighborhoods of activity), considering communication and synchronization simultaneously. The sorting result gives a significant improvement over that for the LPRAM (local-memory PRAM, i.e. unit-size neighborhoods), matches the best known hypercube algorithms when the H-PRAM's latency parameter l(P) is set to log P, and matches the best possible mesh algorithm when l(P)= square root P. The list ranking algorithm demonstrates fundamental limitations of the H-PRAM for nonoblivious problems which have linear-time sequential algorithms.<>