Insights from Application of Elastic Full Wave-Field Inversion in Clastic and Sub-Salt Settings.

P. Routh, A. Baumstein, Y. Cha, Soumya Nayak, Haiyang Wang, D. Tang, J. Barr, Alex Martinez
{"title":"Insights from Application of Elastic Full Wave-Field Inversion in Clastic and Sub-Salt Settings.","authors":"P. Routh, A. Baumstein, Y. Cha, Soumya Nayak, Haiyang Wang, D. Tang, J. Barr, Alex Martinez","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22783-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Elastic Full wave-field (eFWI) inversion is aimed at inferring physical properties of the subsurface directly from seismic data. Goal is use highest level of physics to produce reliable properties to impact upstream business decisions. We focus on elastic parameters particularly the ratio between pressure (P) and shear (S) wave velocity, Vp/Vs that can be indicative of the type of fluid present in subsurface reservoir and P-wave impedance, Ip to impact porosity estimation.\n Our eFWI methodology derives the wavelet directly from seismic shots rather than using well information. Using field examples we explain the eFWI workflow, outline key steps and provide analysis of the results. The first field example is from a structurally simple clastic setting. The second field example is from a complex sub-salt environment and is focused on differentiating net versus non-net in pre-salt carbonate reservoirs - a challenging problem when using narrow azimuth streamer data. The third field example is from a clastic setting and uses well information to scale the wavelet and is applicable in development and production settings.\n Our experiments with the two exploration style field examples show that it is possible to directly invert shot data to obtain geologically meaningful elastic properties useful in exploration and early development phases. However, challenges remain. The inverted Ip has higher fidelity compared to the Vp/Vs ratio. In fact, Ip is sufficiently accurate to be reliably used for porosity prediction. The eFWI Vp/Vs inversion results are only in qualitative agreement with well information (as a blind test) for the clastic example, but sufficient to discriminate the net versus non-net for the pre-salt example. A qualitative match may be insufficient to determine fluid type via rock property inversion without any well control. In an environment without well control, further research is needed to investigate the sensitivity of Vp/Vs and determine if data quality is a key factor, in addition to stabilizing the extraction of elastic parameters in a multi-parameter inverse problem.\n The novel aspect for our approach is in developing a practical eFWI methodology in 3D and working with raw seismic shots with very minimal processing. Examples from different geological settings and use of well versus no-well provide valuable insights into current application space and potential research direction on improvements to eFWI algorithm.","PeriodicalId":283978,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22783-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elastic Full wave-field (eFWI) inversion is aimed at inferring physical properties of the subsurface directly from seismic data. Goal is use highest level of physics to produce reliable properties to impact upstream business decisions. We focus on elastic parameters particularly the ratio between pressure (P) and shear (S) wave velocity, Vp/Vs that can be indicative of the type of fluid present in subsurface reservoir and P-wave impedance, Ip to impact porosity estimation. Our eFWI methodology derives the wavelet directly from seismic shots rather than using well information. Using field examples we explain the eFWI workflow, outline key steps and provide analysis of the results. The first field example is from a structurally simple clastic setting. The second field example is from a complex sub-salt environment and is focused on differentiating net versus non-net in pre-salt carbonate reservoirs - a challenging problem when using narrow azimuth streamer data. The third field example is from a clastic setting and uses well information to scale the wavelet and is applicable in development and production settings. Our experiments with the two exploration style field examples show that it is possible to directly invert shot data to obtain geologically meaningful elastic properties useful in exploration and early development phases. However, challenges remain. The inverted Ip has higher fidelity compared to the Vp/Vs ratio. In fact, Ip is sufficiently accurate to be reliably used for porosity prediction. The eFWI Vp/Vs inversion results are only in qualitative agreement with well information (as a blind test) for the clastic example, but sufficient to discriminate the net versus non-net for the pre-salt example. A qualitative match may be insufficient to determine fluid type via rock property inversion without any well control. In an environment without well control, further research is needed to investigate the sensitivity of Vp/Vs and determine if data quality is a key factor, in addition to stabilizing the extraction of elastic parameters in a multi-parameter inverse problem. The novel aspect for our approach is in developing a practical eFWI methodology in 3D and working with raw seismic shots with very minimal processing. Examples from different geological settings and use of well versus no-well provide valuable insights into current application space and potential research direction on improvements to eFWI algorithm.
弹性全波场反演在碎屑岩和盐下地层应用的启示
弹性全波场(eFWI)反演的目的是直接从地震数据推断地下的物理性质。目标是使用最高级别的物理来产生可靠的属性,以影响上游业务决策。我们关注的是弹性参数,特别是压力波速(P)和剪切波速(S)之间的比值(Vp/Vs),它可以指示地下储层中存在的流体类型,以及P波阻抗(Ip),以影响孔隙度估算。我们的eFWI方法直接从地震数据中提取小波,而不是使用井信息。通过现场实例,我们解释了eFWI工作流程,概述了关键步骤,并对结果进行了分析。第一个野外例子来自一个结构简单的碎屑环境。第二个例子来自复杂的盐下环境,重点是区分盐下碳酸盐岩储层的网状和非网状,这在使用窄方位角流测井数据时是一个具有挑战性的问题。第三个例子来自于碎屑地层,利用井信息对小波进行缩放,适用于开发和生产环境。我们对两个勘探类型的油田实例进行的实验表明,直接反演射孔数据可以获得在勘探和早期开发阶段有用的有地质意义的弹性特性。然而,挑战依然存在。与Vp/Vs比相比,反向Ip具有更高的保真度。事实上,Ip足够精确,可以可靠地用于孔隙度预测。对于碎屑层,eFWI Vp/Vs反演结果仅在定性上与井信息一致(作为盲测),但对于盐下层,eFWI Vp/Vs反演结果足以区分净层与非净层。在没有任何井控的情况下,通过岩石性质反演,定性匹配可能不足以确定流体类型。在没有井控的环境下,除了稳定多参数反问题中弹性参数的提取外,还需要进一步研究Vp/Vs的灵敏度,确定数据质量是否是关键因素。该方法的新颖之处在于开发了一种实用的3D eFWI方法,并以非常少的处理处理原始地震照片。来自不同地质环境的实例以及井与无井的使用情况,为当前的应用空间和改进eFWI算法的潜在研究方向提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信