Peer Critique in an Online Environment: Nature of Student Critiques and Their Perceptions of the Process

Yu-mei Wang, Grace Jepkemboi Komol, D. Voltz
{"title":"Peer Critique in an Online Environment: Nature of Student Critiques and Their Perceptions of the Process","authors":"Yu-mei Wang, Grace Jepkemboi Komol, D. Voltz","doi":"10.1177/00472395231175157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has shown that an effective peer critique process improves the quality of student assignments in various disciplines. Despite its benefits, peer critique is not without challenges. The major concern is the quality of the feedback. Students are not willing to take critical stances in reviewing their peers’ work and they tend to give more positive comments on their peers’ work. Students often complain that most feedback is not useful. Due to poor feedback, students do not feel they have learned from their experiences. This paper reports a longitudinal study investigating peer critique conducted in the online learning environment. The purpose of this study is to observe how students conduct peer critique in an online environment, where interventions are infused and applied to promote group dynamics. Student online critiques were archived. Content analysis was applied in coding student critiques. Student-written reflections were collected to obtain student perceptions about online peer critique.","PeriodicalId":300288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231175157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has shown that an effective peer critique process improves the quality of student assignments in various disciplines. Despite its benefits, peer critique is not without challenges. The major concern is the quality of the feedback. Students are not willing to take critical stances in reviewing their peers’ work and they tend to give more positive comments on their peers’ work. Students often complain that most feedback is not useful. Due to poor feedback, students do not feel they have learned from their experiences. This paper reports a longitudinal study investigating peer critique conducted in the online learning environment. The purpose of this study is to observe how students conduct peer critique in an online environment, where interventions are infused and applied to promote group dynamics. Student online critiques were archived. Content analysis was applied in coding student critiques. Student-written reflections were collected to obtain student perceptions about online peer critique.
在线环境中的同伴批评:学生批评的性质及其对过程的看法
研究表明,有效的同行评议过程可以提高各学科学生作业的质量。尽管有好处,但同侪批评并非没有挑战。主要关注的是反馈的质量。学生不愿意在评价同学的作业时采取批评的立场,他们倾向于对同学的作业给予更积极的评价。学生们经常抱怨大多数反馈都没有用。由于反馈不佳,学生们没有从他们的经历中学到什么。本文报告了一项调查在线学习环境中同伴批评的纵向研究。本研究的目的是观察学生如何在网络环境中进行同伴批评,在这种环境中,干预措施被注入并应用于促进群体动态。学生的网上评论被存档。内容分析应用于编程学生评论。收集学生写的反思,以获得学生对在线同伴评论的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信