{"title":"Effects of tilt on the orientation dynamics of the large-scale circulation in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection","authors":"Dandan Ji, Kunlun Bai, E. Brown","doi":"10.1063/5.0018051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We experimentally test the effects of tilting a turbulent Rayleigh-B{e}nard convection cell on the dynamics of the large-scale circulation (LSC) orientation $\\theta_0$. The probability distribution of $\\theta_0$ is measured, and used to obtain a tilt-induced potential acting on $\\theta_0$, which is used in a low-dimensional model of diffusion of $\\theta_0$ in a potential. The form of the potential is sinusoidal in $\\theta_0$, and linear in tilt angle for small tilt angles, which is explained by a simple geometric model of the vector direction of the mean buoyancy force acting on the LSC. However, the magnitude of the tilt-induced forcing is found to be two orders of magnitude larger than previously predicted. When this parameter is adjusted to match values obtained from the probability distribution of $\\theta_0$, the diffusive model can quantitatively predict effects of tilt on $\\theta_0$. In particular, tilt causes a change in potential barrier height between neighboring corners of a cubic cell, and changes in the barrier-crossing rate for $\\theta_0$ to escape a corner are predicted with an accuracy of $\\pm30\\%$. As a cylindrical cell is tilted, the tilt-induced potential provides a restoring force which induces oscillations when it exceeds the strength of damping; this critical tilt angle is predicted within 20\\%, and the prediction is consistent with measured oscillation frequencies. These observations show that a self-consistent low-dimensional model can be extended to include the dynamics of $\\theta_0$ due to tilt. However, the underprediction of the effect of tilt on $\\theta_0$ warrants revisiting the predicted magnitude.","PeriodicalId":328276,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Fluid Dynamics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0018051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
We experimentally test the effects of tilting a turbulent Rayleigh-B{e}nard convection cell on the dynamics of the large-scale circulation (LSC) orientation $\theta_0$. The probability distribution of $\theta_0$ is measured, and used to obtain a tilt-induced potential acting on $\theta_0$, which is used in a low-dimensional model of diffusion of $\theta_0$ in a potential. The form of the potential is sinusoidal in $\theta_0$, and linear in tilt angle for small tilt angles, which is explained by a simple geometric model of the vector direction of the mean buoyancy force acting on the LSC. However, the magnitude of the tilt-induced forcing is found to be two orders of magnitude larger than previously predicted. When this parameter is adjusted to match values obtained from the probability distribution of $\theta_0$, the diffusive model can quantitatively predict effects of tilt on $\theta_0$. In particular, tilt causes a change in potential barrier height between neighboring corners of a cubic cell, and changes in the barrier-crossing rate for $\theta_0$ to escape a corner are predicted with an accuracy of $\pm30\%$. As a cylindrical cell is tilted, the tilt-induced potential provides a restoring force which induces oscillations when it exceeds the strength of damping; this critical tilt angle is predicted within 20\%, and the prediction is consistent with measured oscillation frequencies. These observations show that a self-consistent low-dimensional model can be extended to include the dynamics of $\theta_0$ due to tilt. However, the underprediction of the effect of tilt on $\theta_0$ warrants revisiting the predicted magnitude.