The Interaction between Accounting Students- Preference, Teaching Methodology and Performance

D. Mattar, R. Khoury
{"title":"The Interaction between Accounting Students- Preference, Teaching Methodology and Performance","authors":"D. Mattar, R. Khoury","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.1058540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examined the influence of matching\nstudents- learning preferences with the teaching methodology\nadopted, on their academic performance in an accounting course in\ntwo types of learning environment in one university in Lebanon:\nclasses with PowerPoint (PPT) vs. conventional classes. Learning\npreferences were either for PPT or for Conventional methodology. A\nstatistically significant increase in academic achievement is found in\nthe conventionally instructed group as compared to the group taught\nwith PPT. This low effectiveness of PPT might be attributed to the\nlearning preferences of Lebanese students. In the PPT group, better\nacademic performance was found among students with\nlearning/teaching match as compared with students with\nlearning/teaching mismatch. Since the majority of students display a\npreference for the conventional methodology, the result might\nsuggest that Lebanese students- performance is not optimized by PPT\nin the accounting classrooms, not because of PPT itself, but because\nit is not matching the Lebanese students- learning preferences in such\na quantitative course.","PeriodicalId":224473,"journal":{"name":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1058540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper examined the influence of matching students- learning preferences with the teaching methodology adopted, on their academic performance in an accounting course in two types of learning environment in one university in Lebanon: classes with PowerPoint (PPT) vs. conventional classes. Learning preferences were either for PPT or for Conventional methodology. A statistically significant increase in academic achievement is found in the conventionally instructed group as compared to the group taught with PPT. This low effectiveness of PPT might be attributed to the learning preferences of Lebanese students. In the PPT group, better academic performance was found among students with learning/teaching match as compared with students with learning/teaching mismatch. Since the majority of students display a preference for the conventional methodology, the result might suggest that Lebanese students- performance is not optimized by PPT in the accounting classrooms, not because of PPT itself, but because it is not matching the Lebanese students- learning preferences in such a quantitative course.
会计学学生偏好、教学方法与绩效的互动
本文考察了在黎巴嫩一所大学的两种学习环境中,学生的学习偏好与所采用的教学方法相匹配对他们在会计课程中的学习成绩的影响:PPT课堂与传统课堂。学习偏好要么是PPT,要么是传统方法。与PPT教学组相比,传统教学组的学习成绩在统计学上有显著提高。PPT的低效率可能与黎巴嫩学生的学习偏好有关。在PPT组中,学与教匹配的学生比学与教不匹配的学生学习成绩更好。由于大多数学生表现出对传统方法的偏好,结果可能表明黎巴嫩学生在会计课堂上的表现没有被PPT优化,不是因为PPT本身,而是因为它不符合黎巴嫩学生在这种定量课程中的学习偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信