The Fundamental Agreement between Montenegro and the Serbian Orthodox Church: A challenge and/or transformation of the understanding of the principle of secularity in Montenegro?

Vasilije V. Marković
{"title":"The Fundamental Agreement between Montenegro and the Serbian Orthodox Church: A challenge and/or transformation of the understanding of the principle of secularity in Montenegro?","authors":"Vasilije V. Marković","doi":"10.5937/adpn2301029m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author analyzes the interaction between the signed Fundamental Agreement between Montenegro and the Serbian Orthodox Church and the principle of secularity proclaimed in the Montenegrin Constitution. After a brief outlook on comparative European solutions, the author stands for the position that Montenegro belongs to systems in which there is (still) a strict type of separation, as opposed to the increasingly present and preferable model of cooperative separation. Starting from the socio-political circumstances that immediately preceded the moment of signing, the author puts forward a thesis according to which, although the amended Law on Freedom of Religion already indicates something like that, the Fundamental Agreement can be the turning point in the evolution of the understanding of the relationship between the state and the church in Montenegro, as a relationship that should be based on mutual cooperation and non-excludability. This thesis attempts to be proven both through the presentation of views on the legal nature of the Fundamental Agreement, as a general act, but not a classic by-law, and the place it has or should have in the hierarchy of legal acts due to its aforementioned sui generis nature, as well as through the analysis of the content of the Fundamental Agreement, i.e. parts of the Preamble and provisions on guaranteeing the public powers of the SPC in the first place. Finally, the desired evolution of the constitutional relationship between the state and the church in Montenegro is seen through the prism of a partial reshaping of the constitutional identity, in which the Constitutional Court of Montenegro can also play a significant role, if accepts to decide on the submitted initiative for the judical review of the Fundamental Agreement.","PeriodicalId":211237,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv za pravne i drustvene nauke","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv za pravne i drustvene nauke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/adpn2301029m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author analyzes the interaction between the signed Fundamental Agreement between Montenegro and the Serbian Orthodox Church and the principle of secularity proclaimed in the Montenegrin Constitution. After a brief outlook on comparative European solutions, the author stands for the position that Montenegro belongs to systems in which there is (still) a strict type of separation, as opposed to the increasingly present and preferable model of cooperative separation. Starting from the socio-political circumstances that immediately preceded the moment of signing, the author puts forward a thesis according to which, although the amended Law on Freedom of Religion already indicates something like that, the Fundamental Agreement can be the turning point in the evolution of the understanding of the relationship between the state and the church in Montenegro, as a relationship that should be based on mutual cooperation and non-excludability. This thesis attempts to be proven both through the presentation of views on the legal nature of the Fundamental Agreement, as a general act, but not a classic by-law, and the place it has or should have in the hierarchy of legal acts due to its aforementioned sui generis nature, as well as through the analysis of the content of the Fundamental Agreement, i.e. parts of the Preamble and provisions on guaranteeing the public powers of the SPC in the first place. Finally, the desired evolution of the constitutional relationship between the state and the church in Montenegro is seen through the prism of a partial reshaping of the constitutional identity, in which the Constitutional Court of Montenegro can also play a significant role, if accepts to decide on the submitted initiative for the judical review of the Fundamental Agreement.
黑山与塞尔维亚东正教会之间的基本协定:对黑山世俗原则理解的挑战和/或转变?
作者分析了黑山与塞尔维亚东正教签署的《基本协定》与黑山宪法中宣布的世俗化原则之间的相互作用。在对比较的欧洲解决办法作了简要的展望之后,作者主张黑山属于(仍然)存在严格分离的制度,而不是日益普遍和更可取的合作分离模式。从签署之前的社会政治环境出发,作者提出了一个论点,根据该论点,虽然修订后的《宗教自由法》已经表明了这一点,但《基本协定》可以成为对黑山国家与教会关系理解演变的转折点,这种关系应该建立在相互合作和非排他性的基础上。本文试图通过陈述意见证明这两个基本协议的法律性质,一般采取行动,而不是经典的细则,而把它的层次结构或者应当合法行为由于其提到的独一无二的特性,以及通过分析内容的基本协议,即序言部分和保证规定的公共权力程控放在第一位。最后,黑山国家与教会之间宪法关系的理想演变是通过部分重塑宪法认同的棱镜来看的,在这方面,黑山宪法法院也可以发挥重要作用,如果接受对提交的关于对《基本协定》进行司法审查的倡议作出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书