Interpretation of law as a problem of legal hermeneutics: some questions of theory

O. Bohinich
{"title":"Interpretation of law as a problem of legal hermeneutics: some questions of theory","authors":"O. Bohinich","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the issue of interpretation of law in the context of the methodology of legal hermeneutics. The key concept of hermeneutics is the concept of understanding. The modern category of understanding is not a way for a person to know the world, but a way of being in the world and has an ontological (rather than psychological, epistemological or logical) character, ahead of any human activity as a prediction (preconception). If hermeneutics is a reconstruction of objectified semantic intentions, then legal hermeneutics is a search in human existence, society for the above values of law and their further formalization in written law. Thus, the interpretation of law in a broad sense is the finding in the material and / or spiritual spheres of its own values and the further implementation of the found in real social relations through the appropriate procedures of lawmaking and law enforcement.\n\nSuch values as good and justice are in particular such value bases. And it is the observance of the latter in the lawmaking process that will allow the legislator with a high degree of probability to identify the normative legal acts adopted by him as those based on legal principles. In this regard, we must agree that the non-classical theory of cognition, in which thinking is considered, above all, as a process of creating meaning or understanding, which occurs in the unity of different types of cognition – sensory, intuitive and rational, more adequate to the nature of intellectual activity. in the course of understanding the law, which has a pronounced practical component.\n\nIn addition to the interpretation of law as an objective phenomenon, which is not yet mediated by positive legislation,the subject field of research is also the rules of law, which have already undergone such a transformation. The need for interpretation of legal requirements is due to the possibility of unequal understanding of legal norms and their inadequate implementation in the process of law enforcement. \n\nThis direction of interpretation in science is better known. Thus, most scholars distinguish between linguistic (linguistic), logical, historical, systemic, teleological ways of interpreting the rules of law.\n\nIt is noted that the teleological method of interpretation of law corresponds to the hermeneutic method of interpretation. The opinion is shared that at the present stage of development there is a of formation of a new direction of legal science with a tendency to formation of a new integrative concept of hermeneutic legal understanding. This type of legal understanding is obliged to give a holistic view of law, overcoming the limitations of sociological, historical, legal and other approaches to it.\n\nKeywords: Interpretation of law, legal hermeneutics, ontological status of law, ontological status of legal hermeneutics.","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the issue of interpretation of law in the context of the methodology of legal hermeneutics. The key concept of hermeneutics is the concept of understanding. The modern category of understanding is not a way for a person to know the world, but a way of being in the world and has an ontological (rather than psychological, epistemological or logical) character, ahead of any human activity as a prediction (preconception). If hermeneutics is a reconstruction of objectified semantic intentions, then legal hermeneutics is a search in human existence, society for the above values of law and their further formalization in written law. Thus, the interpretation of law in a broad sense is the finding in the material and / or spiritual spheres of its own values and the further implementation of the found in real social relations through the appropriate procedures of lawmaking and law enforcement. Such values as good and justice are in particular such value bases. And it is the observance of the latter in the lawmaking process that will allow the legislator with a high degree of probability to identify the normative legal acts adopted by him as those based on legal principles. In this regard, we must agree that the non-classical theory of cognition, in which thinking is considered, above all, as a process of creating meaning or understanding, which occurs in the unity of different types of cognition – sensory, intuitive and rational, more adequate to the nature of intellectual activity. in the course of understanding the law, which has a pronounced practical component. In addition to the interpretation of law as an objective phenomenon, which is not yet mediated by positive legislation,the subject field of research is also the rules of law, which have already undergone such a transformation. The need for interpretation of legal requirements is due to the possibility of unequal understanding of legal norms and their inadequate implementation in the process of law enforcement. This direction of interpretation in science is better known. Thus, most scholars distinguish between linguistic (linguistic), logical, historical, systemic, teleological ways of interpreting the rules of law. It is noted that the teleological method of interpretation of law corresponds to the hermeneutic method of interpretation. The opinion is shared that at the present stage of development there is a of formation of a new direction of legal science with a tendency to formation of a new integrative concept of hermeneutic legal understanding. This type of legal understanding is obliged to give a holistic view of law, overcoming the limitations of sociological, historical, legal and other approaches to it. Keywords: Interpretation of law, legal hermeneutics, ontological status of law, ontological status of legal hermeneutics.
作为法律解释学问题的法律解释:若干理论问题
本文在法律解释学方法论的背景下探讨了法律解释问题。解释学的关键概念是理解的概念。理解的现代范畴不是一个人认识世界的一种方式,而是一种存在于世界中的方式,具有本体论(而不是心理学、认识论或逻辑)的特征,先于任何人类活动作为预测(先入之见)。如果解释学是对客观化语义意图的重建,那么法律解释学就是在人类存在和社会中寻找上述法律价值,并在成文法中进一步形式化。因此,广义上的法律解释是在物质和/或精神领域对其自身价值的发现,并通过立法和执法的适当程序在现实社会关系中进一步实施。善和正义等价值是这种价值的基础。而正是在立法过程中对后者的遵守,才使立法者极有可能将他所采用的规范性法律行为认定为基于法律原则的规范性法律行为。在这方面,我们必须同意非经典的认知理论,在这个理论中,思维首先被认为是一个创造意义或理解的过程,它发生在不同类型的认知的统一中——感觉的、直觉的和理性的,更适合于智力活动的本质。在理解法律的过程中,它具有明显的实践成分。除了将法律解释作为一种客观现象,尚未经过实证立法的中介之外,研究的主题领域也是法治,也已经经历了这样的转变。之所以需要解释法律要求,是因为在执法过程中对法律规范的理解可能不平等,对这些规范的执行可能不充分。科学上的这种解释方向更为人所知。因此,大多数学者区分了语言(语言学)、逻辑、历史、系统和目的论的方式来解释法治。值得注意的是,法律解释的目的论方法与解释的解释学方法相对应。人们普遍认为,在目前的发展阶段,法学正在形成一个新的方向,并倾向于形成一种新的解释性法律理解的综合概念。这种类型的法律理解必须给予法律一个整体的观点,克服社会学、历史学、法学和其他方法的局限性。关键词:法律解释,法律解释学,法律的本体论地位,法律解释学的本体论地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信