Profiles of First Year and Access Chemistry Students' Views of the Study of Chemistry

Marissa Rollnick, G. Green, Margie White, Frackson Mumba, J. Bennett
{"title":"Profiles of First Year and Access Chemistry Students' Views of the Study of Chemistry","authors":"Marissa Rollnick, G. Green, Margie White, Frackson Mumba, J. Bennett","doi":"10.1080/10288457.2001.10756126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study makes use of a previously validated instrument to compare the views about the study of chemistry expressed by two different groups of chemistry students in their first year of study at university. One group was enrolled in an access course, while the other was a group of direct entry students. Six strands were explored in the questionnaire — attitudes to study, practical work, tutorials, lectures, language and, for the first group only, being on an access course. Quantitative findings showed similarities and difference between the groups, most notably that the access students were more positive in their attitudes towards tutorials, while direct entry students, being predominantly English first language speakers, were more positive about language. On the qualitative side, differences and similarities also emerged in the profiles constructed, which were found to be useful for planning future interventions.","PeriodicalId":421869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2001.10756126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Abstract This study makes use of a previously validated instrument to compare the views about the study of chemistry expressed by two different groups of chemistry students in their first year of study at university. One group was enrolled in an access course, while the other was a group of direct entry students. Six strands were explored in the questionnaire — attitudes to study, practical work, tutorials, lectures, language and, for the first group only, being on an access course. Quantitative findings showed similarities and difference between the groups, most notably that the access students were more positive in their attitudes towards tutorials, while direct entry students, being predominantly English first language speakers, were more positive about language. On the qualitative side, differences and similarities also emerged in the profiles constructed, which were found to be useful for planning future interventions.
一年级和初级化学学生对化学研究的看法
摘要:本研究利用一种经过验证的仪器,比较了两组不同的大学一年级化学学生对化学学习的看法。其中一组参加了入门课程,而另一组则是直接入学的学生。调查问卷探讨了六个方面——对学习的态度、实际工作、辅导、讲座、语言,以及仅对第一组人来说正在上入门课程。定量调查结果显示了各组之间的相似之处和差异,最值得注意的是,进入的学生对辅导课的态度更为积极,而直接进入的学生,主要是母语为英语的人,对语言的态度更为积极。在质量方面,所构建的概况也出现了差异和相似之处,这被发现对规划未来的干预措施很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信