What Can the Endogenous Institutions Literature Tell Us About Ancient Rome?

R. K. Fleck, F. Hanssen, Dennis P. Kehoe
{"title":"What Can the Endogenous Institutions Literature Tell Us About Ancient Rome?","authors":"R. K. Fleck, F. Hanssen, Dennis P. Kehoe","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198787204.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large and growing literature on “endogenous” institutions seeks to understand the circumstances under which institutions of particular types arise. One of the literature’s guiding principles is that, because institutions structure the incentives that members of a society face, if institutions are not well matched to a society’s circumstances—that is to say, not designed to inspire productive activities, broadly defined—the society will not thrive. We will discuss how this approach can help modern scholars understand the institutions of the Roman Empire, a society that clearly did thrive. The focus of this paper will be on the Roman imperial government’s policies that promoted the private ownership of land. These policies were crucial to the efforts of the Roman imperial government to create a class of landowners in the cities across the empire who would share in the burdens of ruling the empire. However, the extent to which landowners could dispose of their properties freely was limited by the overall constraints of an ancient agrarian economy and the fiscal requirements of the Roman state.","PeriodicalId":243840,"journal":{"name":"Roman Law and Economics","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roman Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787204.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A large and growing literature on “endogenous” institutions seeks to understand the circumstances under which institutions of particular types arise. One of the literature’s guiding principles is that, because institutions structure the incentives that members of a society face, if institutions are not well matched to a society’s circumstances—that is to say, not designed to inspire productive activities, broadly defined—the society will not thrive. We will discuss how this approach can help modern scholars understand the institutions of the Roman Empire, a society that clearly did thrive. The focus of this paper will be on the Roman imperial government’s policies that promoted the private ownership of land. These policies were crucial to the efforts of the Roman imperial government to create a class of landowners in the cities across the empire who would share in the burdens of ruling the empire. However, the extent to which landowners could dispose of their properties freely was limited by the overall constraints of an ancient agrarian economy and the fiscal requirements of the Roman state.
内生制度文学告诉我们关于古罗马的什么?
关于“内生”制度的大量且不断增长的文献试图理解特定类型制度产生的环境。这些文献的指导原则之一是,由于制度构成了社会成员面临的激励机制,如果制度不能很好地与社会环境相匹配——也就是说,从广义上讲,制度的设计不是为了激发生产活动——社会就不会繁荣。我们将讨论这种方法如何帮助现代学者理解罗马帝国的制度,一个明显繁荣的社会。本文将重点讨论罗马帝国政府促进土地私有制的政策。这些政策对罗马帝国政府的努力至关重要,他们想要在帝国的各个城市里创造一个地主阶级,让他们分担统治帝国的重担。然而,土地所有者可以自由处置其财产的程度受到古代农业经济的总体约束和罗马国家财政要求的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信