Feature selection assessment and comparison using two saliency measures in an Elman recurrent neural network

T. I. Laine, K. Bauer
{"title":"Feature selection assessment and comparison using two saliency measures in an Elman recurrent neural network","authors":"T. I. Laine, K. Bauer","doi":"10.1109/IJCNN.2003.1224016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a summary of a feasibility study conducted to assess and compare a weight based and a network output sensitivity based saliency measure for use with an Elman recurrent neural network (RNN). An experiment was designed to assign temporal data with significant noise, autocorrelation and crosscorrelation into one of two classes. To improve classification accuracy, feature saliency screening was performed to select a subset of the eight candidate input features using a weight based signal-to-noise ratio and an output sensitivity based measure. With consistent selection and ranking of features observed between the two saliency measures, both indicated a parsimonious subset of three of the original eight input features should be retained. Using CPU time as a surrogate measure of operations required, the computational efficiency was also found equivalent, with an observed difference of less than 2.5% between methods. Numerical results show a parsimonious subset of features improved generalization by significantly reducing the classification accuracy variance for multiple data sets and trained RNNs across time periods. An increase in classification accuracy for the last time period was even obtained for an independent validation set using the reduced feature set.","PeriodicalId":310128,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2003.","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2003.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2003.1224016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper provides a summary of a feasibility study conducted to assess and compare a weight based and a network output sensitivity based saliency measure for use with an Elman recurrent neural network (RNN). An experiment was designed to assign temporal data with significant noise, autocorrelation and crosscorrelation into one of two classes. To improve classification accuracy, feature saliency screening was performed to select a subset of the eight candidate input features using a weight based signal-to-noise ratio and an output sensitivity based measure. With consistent selection and ranking of features observed between the two saliency measures, both indicated a parsimonious subset of three of the original eight input features should be retained. Using CPU time as a surrogate measure of operations required, the computational efficiency was also found equivalent, with an observed difference of less than 2.5% between methods. Numerical results show a parsimonious subset of features improved generalization by significantly reducing the classification accuracy variance for multiple data sets and trained RNNs across time periods. An increase in classification accuracy for the last time period was even obtained for an independent validation set using the reduced feature set.
Elman递归神经网络中两种显著性度量的特征选择评估与比较
本文总结了一项可行性研究,该研究旨在评估和比较基于权重和基于网络输出灵敏度的显著性度量,以用于Elman递归神经网络(RNN)。设计了一个实验,将具有显著噪声、自相关和相互相关的时间数据分为两类。为了提高分类精度,进行特征显著性筛选,使用基于权重的信噪比和基于输出灵敏度的度量从八个候选输入特征中选择一个子集。在两种显著性度量之间观察到一致的特征选择和排序,两者都表明应该保留原始8个输入特征中的3个的精简子集。使用CPU时间作为所需操作的替代度量,也发现计算效率是相等的,观察到的方法之间的差异小于2.5%。数值结果表明,通过显著降低多个数据集和经过训练的rnn在不同时间段内的分类精度方差,简化的特征子集提高了泛化能力。对于使用简化特征集的独立验证集,甚至可以获得上一个时间段的分类精度的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书