GRAMMATICAL ERROR ANALYSIS IN EFL SPEAKING PERFORMANCE

Widi Lestari, S. Muljanto, L. Lestari
{"title":"GRAMMATICAL ERROR ANALYSIS IN EFL SPEAKING PERFORMANCE","authors":"Widi Lestari, S. Muljanto, L. Lestari","doi":"10.31980/eealjournal.v3i2.1840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was carried out to analyze the grammatical errror analysis which are made by the students in their speaking performance. It was based on the assumption that grammatical rule has a function in speaking to make the communication clearly and to convey the information in appropriate way. The study was conducted under qualitative methodology by using case study as the appropriate research design. The data source of this research is 1st grade student from the speaking class of English Education major that consisted of 24 students. For collecting the data, the researcher used observation fieldnote and also video record. The writer identified and analyzed data based on the types of error using Dulay’s theory. Based on the finding, the result of this research showed that students made a total errors 318 times divided into four types of errors: omission, addition, misformation, and misordering. From the quantity of each error types, misformation was the highest errors produced by the students. It took 175 times of errors. And omission had 115 times of errors, moreover, 24 errors fell into error of addition, and the last one misordering was the lowest errors produced by the students the total was 5 errors. Actually, errors are necessary in learning a language, especially learning English language as the foreign language. Thus, error analysis also helps the students identify what the errors are made, because the students cannot apply their language acquisition directly without committing error firstly. They cannot achieve the target language perfectly when the errors appear. Error analysis is very advantageous for both learner and teacher. For learner, by paying more attention, the learners are expected to increase their knowledge on the English grammar. Whereas for teachers, hopefully the research can be useful information in teaching process and in the end, the teacher can be able to teach the material appropriately","PeriodicalId":119882,"journal":{"name":"English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31980/eealjournal.v3i2.1840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study was carried out to analyze the grammatical errror analysis which are made by the students in their speaking performance. It was based on the assumption that grammatical rule has a function in speaking to make the communication clearly and to convey the information in appropriate way. The study was conducted under qualitative methodology by using case study as the appropriate research design. The data source of this research is 1st grade student from the speaking class of English Education major that consisted of 24 students. For collecting the data, the researcher used observation fieldnote and also video record. The writer identified and analyzed data based on the types of error using Dulay’s theory. Based on the finding, the result of this research showed that students made a total errors 318 times divided into four types of errors: omission, addition, misformation, and misordering. From the quantity of each error types, misformation was the highest errors produced by the students. It took 175 times of errors. And omission had 115 times of errors, moreover, 24 errors fell into error of addition, and the last one misordering was the lowest errors produced by the students the total was 5 errors. Actually, errors are necessary in learning a language, especially learning English language as the foreign language. Thus, error analysis also helps the students identify what the errors are made, because the students cannot apply their language acquisition directly without committing error firstly. They cannot achieve the target language perfectly when the errors appear. Error analysis is very advantageous for both learner and teacher. For learner, by paying more attention, the learners are expected to increase their knowledge on the English grammar. Whereas for teachers, hopefully the research can be useful information in teaching process and in the end, the teacher can be able to teach the material appropriately
英语口语表达中的语法错误分析
本研究的目的是分析学生在口语表现中出现的语法错误。它基于这样一种假设,即语法规则在说话中具有使交流清晰和以适当的方式传达信息的功能。本研究采用定性研究方法,采用个案研究作为适当的研究设计。本研究的数据来源为英语教育专业口语班的一年级学生,共24名学生。为了收集数据,研究人员使用了观察现场笔记和视频记录。作者运用Dulay的理论,根据误差类型对数据进行识别和分析。在此基础上,本研究的结果显示,学生共犯错误318次,分为四种类型:遗漏、添加、错误和错误排序。从各种错误类型的数量来看,误读是学生产生的最高错误。它的错误率是175倍。遗漏错误115次,其中加法错误24次,最后一个错序错误是学生产生错误最少的,总共5个错误。实际上,在学习一门语言的过程中,尤其是学习作为外语的英语时,错误是必要的。因此,错误分析也可以帮助学生识别错误,因为学生不先犯错误就不能直接应用他们的语言习得。当错误出现时,他们无法完美地实现目标语。错误分析对学习者和教师都是非常有利的。对于学习者来说,通过更多的关注,学习者有望增加他们的英语语法知识。而对于教师来说,希望这些研究能够在教学过程中提供有用的信息,最终使教师能够正确地教授这些材料
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信