Social Implications of Technological Disruptions: A Transdisciplinary Cybernetics Science and Occupational Science Perspective

Pedro H. Albuquerque, Sophie Albuquerque
{"title":"Social Implications of Technological Disruptions: A Transdisciplinary Cybernetics Science and Occupational Science Perspective","authors":"Pedro H. Albuquerque, Sophie Albuquerque","doi":"10.1109/ETHICS57328.2023.10154939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we argue that the disruptive social implications of skill-replacing technological innovations are determined neither by human characteristics, such as “low skills” or “low cognition,” nor by task characteristics, such as “routine,” as it is typically assumed in the predominant economics and management science literature, but by the cybernetic characteristics of the innovations. We also propose that the negative effects of technological disruptions on human well-being cannot be fully understood without the use of a transdisciplinary approach involving cybernetics science and occupational science, and that it is urgent that policymakers look beyond their narrow effects on productivity and on the labor force, and consider instead the complexity of the interactions between cybernetic technologies and meaningful human occupations. We offer as an example the case of the fast adoption of online food delivery services and of remote work technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ethical implications are derived from the arguments.","PeriodicalId":203527,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS)","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETHICS57328.2023.10154939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this article we argue that the disruptive social implications of skill-replacing technological innovations are determined neither by human characteristics, such as “low skills” or “low cognition,” nor by task characteristics, such as “routine,” as it is typically assumed in the predominant economics and management science literature, but by the cybernetic characteristics of the innovations. We also propose that the negative effects of technological disruptions on human well-being cannot be fully understood without the use of a transdisciplinary approach involving cybernetics science and occupational science, and that it is urgent that policymakers look beyond their narrow effects on productivity and on the labor force, and consider instead the complexity of the interactions between cybernetic technologies and meaningful human occupations. We offer as an example the case of the fast adoption of online food delivery services and of remote work technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ethical implications are derived from the arguments.
技术中断的社会影响:一个跨学科控制论科学和职业科学的视角
在本文中,我们认为,技能替代技术创新的破坏性社会影响既不是由人类特征(如“低技能”或“低认知”)决定的,也不是由任务特征(如“常规”)决定的,正如主流经济学和管理科学文献中通常假设的那样,而是由创新的控制论特征决定的。我们还提出,如果不使用涉及控制论科学和职业科学的跨学科方法,就无法充分理解技术破坏对人类福祉的负面影响,决策者迫切需要超越它们对生产力和劳动力的狭隘影响,而是考虑控制论技术与有意义的人类职业之间相互作用的复杂性。我们以2019冠状病毒病大流行期间快速采用在线送餐服务和远程工作技术为例。从这些争论中衍生出伦理含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信