International experience in legal support of freedom of speech on the Internet

L. Golovko, V. Ladychenko, Olga Kapplová
{"title":"International experience in legal support of freedom of speech on the Internet","authors":"L. Golovko, V. Ladychenko, Olga Kapplová","doi":"10.31548/law/2.2023.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the studied subject lies in the fact that freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that should be ensured at the legislative level. However, in the era of rapid development of information and communication technologies, it is necessary to find a balance between such provision and the protection of the rights of others. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the legal support of freedom of speech at the international level, and the experience of foreign countries in the legal regulation of this issue. The study utilises general theoretical methods of research, namely historical, abstract-logical, systemic-functional, analysis and synthesis, the method of theoretical generalisation to generalise the theoretical and legal foundations of ensuring freedom of speech existing in foreign countries and to systematise the components of the right to freedom of speech and criteria and conditions for restricting the right to freedom of speech and the right to express views and beliefs. Comparative legal method is used for the analysis and comparison of foreign legislation regulating freedom of speech and the right to express views and beliefs on the Internet. The paper substantiates that the problem of legal regulation of ensuring freedom of speech lies in the complexity of achieving an optimal balance between guaranteeing the right to freedom of speech and protecting others. It is revealed that the implementation of the right to freedom of speech on the Internet and in social networks in the United States, Japan, China, and Germany is regulated differently on the legislative level and various approaches are used. Special attention is paid to legislative provision of responsibility for spreading false information, protection of public safety, and protection of copyright on the Internet. The opinion is justified that the experience of Japan and Germany is the most acceptable for Ukraine. The practical importance of the study lies in the fact that the analysis of the legislation of foreign countries allowed identifying the features of legal regulation of the right to freedom of speech in individual states and establishing the advantages and disadvantages that may exist in this field.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law. Human. Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law/2.2023.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the studied subject lies in the fact that freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that should be ensured at the legislative level. However, in the era of rapid development of information and communication technologies, it is necessary to find a balance between such provision and the protection of the rights of others. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the legal support of freedom of speech at the international level, and the experience of foreign countries in the legal regulation of this issue. The study utilises general theoretical methods of research, namely historical, abstract-logical, systemic-functional, analysis and synthesis, the method of theoretical generalisation to generalise the theoretical and legal foundations of ensuring freedom of speech existing in foreign countries and to systematise the components of the right to freedom of speech and criteria and conditions for restricting the right to freedom of speech and the right to express views and beliefs. Comparative legal method is used for the analysis and comparison of foreign legislation regulating freedom of speech and the right to express views and beliefs on the Internet. The paper substantiates that the problem of legal regulation of ensuring freedom of speech lies in the complexity of achieving an optimal balance between guaranteeing the right to freedom of speech and protecting others. It is revealed that the implementation of the right to freedom of speech on the Internet and in social networks in the United States, Japan, China, and Germany is regulated differently on the legislative level and various approaches are used. Special attention is paid to legislative provision of responsibility for spreading false information, protection of public safety, and protection of copyright on the Internet. The opinion is justified that the experience of Japan and Germany is the most acceptable for Ukraine. The practical importance of the study lies in the fact that the analysis of the legislation of foreign countries allowed identifying the features of legal regulation of the right to freedom of speech in individual states and establishing the advantages and disadvantages that may exist in this field.
法律支持互联网言论自由的国际经验
所研究主题的相关性在于,言论自由是一项基本人权,应在立法一级予以保障。然而,在信息和通信技术迅速发展的时代,必须在这种规定与保护他人权利之间找到平衡。本文旨在探讨国际上对言论自由的法律支持,以及国外在这一问题上的法律规制经验。本研究运用史学、抽象逻辑、系统功能、分析综合等一般理论研究方法,运用理论概括的方法,概括国外保障言论自由的理论和法律基础,将言论自由权的构成要素、限制言论自由权、表达观点和信仰权的标准和条件系统化。采用比较法的方法,对国外规制网络言论自由和表达观点和信仰权利的立法进行分析和比较。文章认为,保障言论自由的法律规制问题在于如何在保障言论自由权与保护他人权利之间取得最佳平衡的复杂性。研究发现,美国、日本、中国和德国在立法层面对互联网和社交网络中言论自由权的实施进行了不同的监管,并采用了不同的方法。特别要注意的是对传播虚假信息责任的立法规定、对公共安全的保护以及对互联网版权的保护。日本和德国的经验是乌克兰最能接受的,这种观点是有道理的。本研究的现实意义在于,通过对国外立法的分析,可以识别出各国对言论自由权的法律规制特点,并确定这一领域可能存在的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信