Optimal Selection of Equivalence Factors for ECMS in Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicles

Shailesh U. Hegde, A. Bonfitto, Hadi Rahmeh, N. Amati, A. Tonoli
{"title":"Optimal Selection of Equivalence Factors for ECMS in Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicles","authors":"Shailesh U. Hegde, A. Bonfitto, Hadi Rahmeh, N. Amati, A. Tonoli","doi":"10.1115/detc2021-71621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The increasing stringent emissions regulation over the years have shifted the focus of automotive industry towards more efficient fuel economy solutions. One such solution is Hybrid electric architecture, which is able to improve the fuel economy and consequently cutting down emissions. A well known control strategy to solve optimization problem for energy management of Hybrid electric vehicles is ECMS (Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy). Finding the best control parameters (equivalence factors) of this strategy may become quite involved. This paper proposes a method for the selection of the optimal equivalence factors, for charging and discharging, by applying genetic algorithm in the case of a P0 mild hybrid electric vehicle. This method is a systematic and deterministic way to guarantee an optimal solution with respect to the trial and error method. The proposed ECMS is compared to a technique available in literature, known as the shooting method, which relies only on one equivalence factor for discharging. It is demonstrated that the performance in terms of pollutant emissions are comparable. However, ECMS with GA always guarantees an optimal solution even in the case of heavy accessory load, when shooting method is not valid anymore, as it does not guarantee a charge sustaining condition.","PeriodicalId":194875,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: 23rd International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies (AVT)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: 23rd International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies (AVT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2021-71621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The increasing stringent emissions regulation over the years have shifted the focus of automotive industry towards more efficient fuel economy solutions. One such solution is Hybrid electric architecture, which is able to improve the fuel economy and consequently cutting down emissions. A well known control strategy to solve optimization problem for energy management of Hybrid electric vehicles is ECMS (Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy). Finding the best control parameters (equivalence factors) of this strategy may become quite involved. This paper proposes a method for the selection of the optimal equivalence factors, for charging and discharging, by applying genetic algorithm in the case of a P0 mild hybrid electric vehicle. This method is a systematic and deterministic way to guarantee an optimal solution with respect to the trial and error method. The proposed ECMS is compared to a technique available in literature, known as the shooting method, which relies only on one equivalence factor for discharging. It is demonstrated that the performance in terms of pollutant emissions are comparable. However, ECMS with GA always guarantees an optimal solution even in the case of heavy accessory load, when shooting method is not valid anymore, as it does not guarantee a charge sustaining condition.
轻度混合动力汽车ECMS等效因子的优化选择
多年来,日益严格的排放法规已将汽车行业的重点转向更高效的燃油经济性解决方案。其中一个解决方案是混合动力架构,它能够提高燃油经济性,从而减少排放。解决混合动力汽车能量管理优化问题的控制策略是等效消耗最小化策略(ECMS)。寻找该策略的最佳控制参数(等效因子)可能会变得相当复杂。以P0型轻度混合动力汽车为例,提出了一种应用遗传算法选择充放电最优等效因子的方法。该方法相对于试错法是一种保证最优解的系统的、确定性的方法。提出的ECMS与文献中可用的技术进行了比较,称为射击方法,它只依赖于一个等效因子来放电。结果表明,在污染物排放方面的性能具有可比性。然而,即使在射击方法不再有效的情况下,具有遗传算法的ECMS也始终保证最优解,因为它不能保证电荷维持条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信