Usability Assessments for Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays in Open Surgery and Interventional Procedures: A Systematic Review

Ellenor Brown, Kyoko Fujimoto, Bennett Blumenkopf, A. S. Kim, K. Kontson, H. Benz
{"title":"Usability Assessments for Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays in Open Surgery and Interventional Procedures: A Systematic Review","authors":"Ellenor Brown, Kyoko Fujimoto, Bennett Blumenkopf, A. S. Kim, K. Kontson, H. Benz","doi":"10.3390/mti7050049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) are an increasingly popular technology. For surgical applications, the use of AR HMDs to display medical images or models may reduce invasiveness and improve task performance by enhancing understanding of the underlying anatomy. This technology may be particularly beneficial in open surgeries and interventional procedures for which the use of endoscopes, microscopes, or other visualization tools is insufficient or infeasible. While the capabilities of AR HMDs are promising, their usability for surgery is not well-defined. This review identifies current trends in the literature, including device types, surgical specialties, and reporting of user demographics, and provides a description of usability assessments of AR HMDs for open surgeries and interventional procedures. Assessments applied to other extended reality technologies are included to identify additional usability assessments for consideration when assessing AR HMDs. The PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched through September 2022 for relevant articles that described user studies. User assessments most often addressed task performance. However, objective measurements of cognitive, visual, and physical loads, known to affect task performance and the occurrence of adverse events, were limited. There was also incomplete reporting of user demographics. This review reveals knowledge and methodology gaps for usability of AR HMDs and demonstrates the potential impact of future usability research.","PeriodicalId":408374,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Technol. Interact.","volume":"304 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Technol. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7050049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) are an increasingly popular technology. For surgical applications, the use of AR HMDs to display medical images or models may reduce invasiveness and improve task performance by enhancing understanding of the underlying anatomy. This technology may be particularly beneficial in open surgeries and interventional procedures for which the use of endoscopes, microscopes, or other visualization tools is insufficient or infeasible. While the capabilities of AR HMDs are promising, their usability for surgery is not well-defined. This review identifies current trends in the literature, including device types, surgical specialties, and reporting of user demographics, and provides a description of usability assessments of AR HMDs for open surgeries and interventional procedures. Assessments applied to other extended reality technologies are included to identify additional usability assessments for consideration when assessing AR HMDs. The PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched through September 2022 for relevant articles that described user studies. User assessments most often addressed task performance. However, objective measurements of cognitive, visual, and physical loads, known to affect task performance and the occurrence of adverse events, were limited. There was also incomplete reporting of user demographics. This review reveals knowledge and methodology gaps for usability of AR HMDs and demonstrates the potential impact of future usability research.
增强现实头戴式显示器在开放性手术和介入性手术中的可用性评估:系统综述
增强现实(AR)头戴式显示器(hmd)是一项日益流行的技术。对于外科应用,使用AR头显显示医学图像或模型可以通过增强对基础解剖结构的理解来减少侵入性并提高任务性能。这项技术在使用内窥镜、显微镜或其他可视化工具不足或不可行的开放式手术和介入性手术中可能特别有益。虽然AR头显的功能很有希望,但它们在手术中的可用性还没有明确定义。本综述确定了文献中的当前趋势,包括设备类型、外科专科和用户人口统计报告,并提供了AR头戴式设备用于开放性手术和介入手术的可用性评估描述。应用于其他扩展现实技术的评估包括在评估AR头显时确定额外的可用性评估。到2022年9月,在PubMed、Web of Science和EMBASE数据库中搜索描述用户研究的相关文章。用户评估通常是针对任务性能的。然而,对已知会影响任务表现和不良事件发生的认知、视觉和身体负荷的客观测量是有限的。用户人口统计数据的报告也不完整。这篇综述揭示了AR头显可用性的知识和方法差距,并展示了未来可用性研究的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信