A Study on Energy Platform Using Data in the US: Based on Opening Platform Model

Song Minzheong
{"title":"A Study on Energy Platform Using Data in the US: Based on Opening Platform Model","authors":"Song Minzheong","doi":"10.33422/7th.omeaconf.2021.06.348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze various energy platforms using data in the US and to suggest directions and implications. Some of the leading energy platforms are selected and analyzed based on the opening platform model. We focus on the case analysis of the US utility companies. In case of the horizontal open platform, Green Button sponsor’s ‘Connect My Data (CMD)’ driven by the government invites the utility companies to jointly develop the sponsor’s data solution. In case of the vertical open platform, the certification program ‘Share My Data (SMD)’ allows backward compatibility, because the technical improvement is minimal. The utility companies benchmark Amazon’s three-sided market mediation and prefer platform and category exclusivity. For the former, they have data analytics companies like Enervee, Opower and for the latter, they have electronics manufactures and energy service providers (ESPs) like Distributed Energy Resources (DERs). Based on this US case study, we suggest the energy platforms to open their platform for renewable energy supply, energy conservation, high-efficiency products, and residential DER dissemination. To successfully implement the government’s energy transition policy, the US platforms should be benchmarked as a business model. Especially, it is needed for them to coordinate a platform ecosystem. To ensure trust in the products and services offered on the marketplace platform, platform’s certification program is helpful.","PeriodicalId":191757,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ‏The 7th International Conference on Opportunities and Challenges in Management, Economics and Accounting","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ‏The 7th International Conference on Opportunities and Challenges in Management, Economics and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/7th.omeaconf.2021.06.348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze various energy platforms using data in the US and to suggest directions and implications. Some of the leading energy platforms are selected and analyzed based on the opening platform model. We focus on the case analysis of the US utility companies. In case of the horizontal open platform, Green Button sponsor’s ‘Connect My Data (CMD)’ driven by the government invites the utility companies to jointly develop the sponsor’s data solution. In case of the vertical open platform, the certification program ‘Share My Data (SMD)’ allows backward compatibility, because the technical improvement is minimal. The utility companies benchmark Amazon’s three-sided market mediation and prefer platform and category exclusivity. For the former, they have data analytics companies like Enervee, Opower and for the latter, they have electronics manufactures and energy service providers (ESPs) like Distributed Energy Resources (DERs). Based on this US case study, we suggest the energy platforms to open their platform for renewable energy supply, energy conservation, high-efficiency products, and residential DER dissemination. To successfully implement the government’s energy transition policy, the US platforms should be benchmarked as a business model. Especially, it is needed for them to coordinate a platform ecosystem. To ensure trust in the products and services offered on the marketplace platform, platform’s certification program is helpful.
基于开放平台模型的美国能源平台数据利用研究
本研究的目的是利用美国的数据分析各种能源平台,并提出方向和影响。在开放平台模型的基础上,对部分领先的能源平台进行了选择和分析。我们着重于美国公用事业公司的案例分析。在横向开放平台的情况下,由政府推动的绿色按钮发起人“连接我的数据(CMD)”邀请公用事业公司共同开发发起人的数据解决方案。在垂直开放平台的情况下,认证程序“共享我的数据(SMD)”允许向后兼容,因为技术改进是最小的。公用事业公司以亚马逊的三方市场中介为基准,更喜欢平台和品类的排他性。前者有Enervee、Opower等数据分析公司,后者有电子产品制造商和分布式能源(DERs)等能源服务提供商。基于美国的案例研究,我们建议能源平台在可再生能源供应、节能、高效产品和住宅DER推广等方面开放平台。为了成功实施政府的能源转型政策,美国的平台应该成为一种商业模式。特别是,他们需要协调一个平台生态系统。为了确保对市场平台上提供的产品和服务的信任,平台的认证程序是有帮助的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信