Intercomparison of Estimates of Reference Evapotranspiration of Surat Region of Gujarat, India

N. Vivekanandan, C. Srishailam, R. Patil
{"title":"Intercomparison of Estimates of Reference Evapotranspiration of Surat Region of Gujarat, India","authors":"N. Vivekanandan, C. Srishailam, R. Patil","doi":"10.54203/jceu.2022.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evapotranspiration is a vital parameter for irrigation planning and management, and for hydrological and climatological studies. This can be estimated by using Blaney-Criddle (BC), Thornthwaite (TW), Hargreaves (HG) and Penman-Monteith (PM) methods. Out of these methods, BC and TW are known as temperature based whereas HG is radiation based and PM is based on Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) report on crop water requirements. This paper illustrates a study on comparison on estimates of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) obtained from temperature, radiation and FAO based methods for Surat region. The meteorological data such as air temperature, relative humidity and sunshine hours observed at Surat region for the period 2001 to 2016 is used. In addition, the wind speed and solar radiation data is downloaded from the International Water Management Institute website and used in estimation of ETo using PM. The performance of the methods used in estimation of ETo is evaluated through regression analysis by developing a linear regression between the observed and estimated values of ETo using BC, TW and HG, and FAO based PM. The results of linear regression analysis indicated that there is a good line of agreement between the observed and estimated ETo using PM with CC of 0.968 when compared with those values of BC, TW and HG. The study show that the PM is better suited amongst four methods applied in estimating the ETo for Surat region, Gujarat.","PeriodicalId":151760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54203/jceu.2022.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evapotranspiration is a vital parameter for irrigation planning and management, and for hydrological and climatological studies. This can be estimated by using Blaney-Criddle (BC), Thornthwaite (TW), Hargreaves (HG) and Penman-Monteith (PM) methods. Out of these methods, BC and TW are known as temperature based whereas HG is radiation based and PM is based on Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) report on crop water requirements. This paper illustrates a study on comparison on estimates of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) obtained from temperature, radiation and FAO based methods for Surat region. The meteorological data such as air temperature, relative humidity and sunshine hours observed at Surat region for the period 2001 to 2016 is used. In addition, the wind speed and solar radiation data is downloaded from the International Water Management Institute website and used in estimation of ETo using PM. The performance of the methods used in estimation of ETo is evaluated through regression analysis by developing a linear regression between the observed and estimated values of ETo using BC, TW and HG, and FAO based PM. The results of linear regression analysis indicated that there is a good line of agreement between the observed and estimated ETo using PM with CC of 0.968 when compared with those values of BC, TW and HG. The study show that the PM is better suited amongst four methods applied in estimating the ETo for Surat region, Gujarat.
印度古吉拉特邦苏拉特地区参考蒸散估算的相互比较
蒸散量是灌溉规划和管理以及水文和气候学研究的重要参数。这可以用Blaney-Criddle (BC)、Thornthwaite (TW)、Hargreaves (HG)和Penman-Monteith (PM)方法来估计。在这些方法中,已知BC和TW是基于温度的,而HG是基于辐射的,PM是基于粮农组织(FAO)关于作物需水量的报告。本文介绍了一项比较苏拉特地区参考蒸散发(ETo)估算值的研究,该估算值来自温度、辐射和基于FAO的方法。使用苏拉特地区2001 - 2016年的气温、相对湿度和日照时数等气象资料。此外,风速和太阳辐射数据可从国际水管理研究所网站下载,并用于利用PM估算ETo。利用BC、TW和HG以及基于FAO的PM,在ETo的观测值和估计值之间建立线性回归,通过回归分析评估ETo估算方法的性能。线性回归分析结果表明,与BC、TW和HG的估算值相比,PM的观测值与估算值具有较好的一致性,其CC值为0.968,表明PM更适合于古吉拉特邦Surat地区的ETo估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书