Evaluating Reservoir Pressure Gradient Trend for the Delaware Basin’s Potash Area Using Machine Learning & Geophysical Log Cross-Sections Approach

Olabode Ajibola, J. Sheng, E. Unal, Christopher Armistead, James Rutley, J. Smitherman
{"title":"Evaluating Reservoir Pressure Gradient Trend for the Delaware Basin’s Potash Area Using Machine Learning & Geophysical Log Cross-Sections Approach","authors":"Olabode Ajibola, J. Sheng, E. Unal, Christopher Armistead, James Rutley, J. Smitherman","doi":"10.2118/209899-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The reservoir pressure trend prediction for the potash area of Delaware Basin would enhance its optimum producible depths selection. It is significant for safe drilling, effective, and efficient governmental drilling permits approval in the area. Avoiding kicks, blowouts, fluid loss, pipe differential sticking, and heaving shales prevention improved wellbore control. This also leads to dependable wellbore integrity and better reservoir or well fluids control which are some of the benefits of proper reservoir pressure trend prediction.\n This study used the reservoir pressures predicted by Multilinear Regression machine learning model to verify the reservoir pressures calculated using drilling data from the potash area. Then, pressure trends are built for the area with Petra using geophysical log cross-sections. The results from these pressure trends are presented in 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional forms for the area to connect permitting optimum safely producible depths with hydrocarbon production. The study utilized drilling and well logs data from about 229 wells. All the wells were drilled and completed within the Potash Area to at least the base of Wolfcamp formation.\n The geophysical log cross-sections were created in 2- and 3-Dimensional forms using Petra, Matlab, and R machine languages. For the Multilinear Regression model over 330,000 data points from model parameters such as Deep & Shallow Laterolog Resistivities, Gamma Ray log, Neutron & Density Porosity Limestone logs, Sonic logs, caliper log, depth, lithology, mud weight, Photoelectric Cross-section, average porosity, water saturation, corrected bulk density log, and bulk density log were used. The datasets were grouped into 70 percent training and 30 percent testing randomly. The Multilinear Regression model predicted the reservoir pressures with high accuracy where the coefficient of determination (R2) is greater than 0.990. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) ranges from 0.0086 to 0.034 psi/ft between the predicted and the measured reservoir pressure data. The validation of the Regression model was done using another dataset. The reservoir pressures were predicted by the model with high accuracy using the validation dataset. The coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.99. This study shows that the regression model is reliable and can predict the reservoir pressures for the area accurately using well logs, drilling data, and geophysical data. Furthermore, verified reservoir pressures is used to build reservoir pressure trends for the area.\n The reservoir pressure trend can then be used to select the optimum producible depths in the area in order to promote safe, cost efficient, and optimum hydrocarbon recovery in the area. This study will also promote concurrent operations in prospecting for, developing, and producing oil and gas and potash deposits owned by the United States within the Designated Potash Area (DPA) (BLM Secretary Order, 2012).","PeriodicalId":226577,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, August 10, 2022","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, August 10, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209899-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reservoir pressure trend prediction for the potash area of Delaware Basin would enhance its optimum producible depths selection. It is significant for safe drilling, effective, and efficient governmental drilling permits approval in the area. Avoiding kicks, blowouts, fluid loss, pipe differential sticking, and heaving shales prevention improved wellbore control. This also leads to dependable wellbore integrity and better reservoir or well fluids control which are some of the benefits of proper reservoir pressure trend prediction. This study used the reservoir pressures predicted by Multilinear Regression machine learning model to verify the reservoir pressures calculated using drilling data from the potash area. Then, pressure trends are built for the area with Petra using geophysical log cross-sections. The results from these pressure trends are presented in 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional forms for the area to connect permitting optimum safely producible depths with hydrocarbon production. The study utilized drilling and well logs data from about 229 wells. All the wells were drilled and completed within the Potash Area to at least the base of Wolfcamp formation. The geophysical log cross-sections were created in 2- and 3-Dimensional forms using Petra, Matlab, and R machine languages. For the Multilinear Regression model over 330,000 data points from model parameters such as Deep & Shallow Laterolog Resistivities, Gamma Ray log, Neutron & Density Porosity Limestone logs, Sonic logs, caliper log, depth, lithology, mud weight, Photoelectric Cross-section, average porosity, water saturation, corrected bulk density log, and bulk density log were used. The datasets were grouped into 70 percent training and 30 percent testing randomly. The Multilinear Regression model predicted the reservoir pressures with high accuracy where the coefficient of determination (R2) is greater than 0.990. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) ranges from 0.0086 to 0.034 psi/ft between the predicted and the measured reservoir pressure data. The validation of the Regression model was done using another dataset. The reservoir pressures were predicted by the model with high accuracy using the validation dataset. The coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.99. This study shows that the regression model is reliable and can predict the reservoir pressures for the area accurately using well logs, drilling data, and geophysical data. Furthermore, verified reservoir pressures is used to build reservoir pressure trends for the area. The reservoir pressure trend can then be used to select the optimum producible depths in the area in order to promote safe, cost efficient, and optimum hydrocarbon recovery in the area. This study will also promote concurrent operations in prospecting for, developing, and producing oil and gas and potash deposits owned by the United States within the Designated Potash Area (DPA) (BLM Secretary Order, 2012).
利用机器学习和地球物理测井截面方法评估Delaware盆地钾肥区储层压力梯度趋势
对特拉华盆地钾肥区进行储层压力趋势预测,有助于该区最佳生产深度的选择。这对该地区的安全钻井、有效和高效的政府钻井许可审批具有重要意义。避免了井涌、井喷、流体漏失、油管差动卡钻和防止页岩隆起,改善了井筒控制。这也带来了可靠的井筒完整性和更好的储层或井流体控制,这是适当的储层压力趋势预测的一些好处。本研究利用多元线性回归机器学习模型预测的储层压力,验证了利用钾肥区钻井数据计算的储层压力。然后,利用地球物理测井截面为Petra区域建立压力趋势。这些压力趋势的结果以二维和三维形式呈现,以便将该区域连接起来,从而获得最佳的安全生产深度和油气产量。该研究利用了约229口井的钻井和测井数据。所有的井都是在Potash地区至少到Wolfcamp地层底部的范围内钻完的。使用Petra、Matlab和R机器语言以二维和三维形式创建地球物理测井截面。对于多元线性回归模型,使用了来自模型参数的33万多数据点,如深、浅侧向电阻率、伽马测井、中子和密度孔隙度石灰石测井、声波测井、井径测井、深度、岩性、泥浆比重、光电截面、平均孔隙度、含水饱和度、校正体积密度测井和体积密度测井。数据集随机分为70%的训练组和30%的测试组。多元线性回归模型预测储层压力精度高,决定系数(R2)大于0.990。预测与实测油藏压力数据的均方根误差(RMSE)范围为0.0086 ~ 0.034 psi/ft。回归模型的验证使用另一个数据集完成。利用验证数据集对储层压力进行了高精度预测。决定系数(R2)为0.99。研究表明,该回归模型是可靠的,可以利用测井资料、钻井资料和地球物理资料准确预测该地区的储层压力。此外,利用已验证的油藏压力建立该地区的油藏压力趋势。然后,可以利用储层压力趋势来选择该地区的最佳生产深度,以促进该地区安全、经济、最佳的油气采收率。本研究还将促进在指定钾肥区(DPA)内勘探、开发和生产美国拥有的油气和钾肥矿床的同步作业(2012年美国国土资源部秘书令)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信