Towards a new justification of the Tastle-Wierman (TW) dissention and consensus measures (and their potential role in education)

K. Villaverde, O. Kosheleva
{"title":"Towards a new justification of the Tastle-Wierman (TW) dissention and consensus measures (and their potential role in education)","authors":"K. Villaverde, O. Kosheleva","doi":"10.1109/NAFIPS.2010.5548273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To estimate how close the estimates of different experts are, W. J. Tastle and M. J. Wierman proposed numerical measures of dissention and consensus, and showed that these measures indeed capture the intuitive ideas of dissent and consensus. In this paper, we show that the Tastle-Wierman formulas can be naturally derived from the basic formulas of fuzzy logic. We also show that these formulas can be used in education, to describe how different the grades of different students are.","PeriodicalId":394892,"journal":{"name":"2010 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.2010.5548273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

To estimate how close the estimates of different experts are, W. J. Tastle and M. J. Wierman proposed numerical measures of dissention and consensus, and showed that these measures indeed capture the intuitive ideas of dissent and consensus. In this paper, we show that the Tastle-Wierman formulas can be naturally derived from the basic formulas of fuzzy logic. We also show that these formulas can be used in education, to describe how different the grades of different students are.
对Tastle-Wierman (TW)分歧和共识措施的新论证(及其在教育中的潜在作用)
为了估计不同专家的估计有多接近,W. J. Tastle和M. J. Wierman提出了不同意见和共识的数值测量方法,并表明这些方法确实捕捉到了不同意见和共识的直观概念。本文证明了从模糊逻辑的基本公式中可以很自然地推导出Tastle-Wierman公式。我们还展示了这些公式可以用于教育,来描述不同学生的成绩差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信