Assessing child sexual offenders' modus operandi: Accuracy in self-reported use of threats and coercion

K. Kaufman, Daniel R. Hilliker, Patty Lathrop, E. Daleiden
{"title":"Assessing child sexual offenders' modus operandi: Accuracy in self-reported use of threats and coercion","authors":"K. Kaufman, Daniel R. Hilliker, Patty Lathrop, E. Daleiden","doi":"10.1177/107906329300600304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent evidence suggests that child sexual offenders' self-report can provide a reliable source of information regarding offenders' use of threats and violence. However, the majority of studies in this area have specifically focused on coercion occurring within sexually abusive acts. The current investigation examined the accuracy of offenders' self-report regarding their use of threats and violence with child and adolescent victims during two time periods: (1) while attempting to secure victims' cooperation in sexual activities; and (2) while seeking to maintain victims' silence regarding the abuse. The responses of 16 offenders in an incarcerated treatment setting and 16 in an outpatient treatment program were compared with treatment staff's responses on an anonymous questionnaire. Findings generally indicated a high level of concordance between offender and staff reports. However, both groups of offenders significantly under-reported their use of threats and violence for both time periods. While some of the under-reported items reflected overt forms of violence (e.g., forced participation), the majority represented subtle, manipulative, and/or implied threats. Implications for future studies and clinical applications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":340989,"journal":{"name":"Annals of sex research","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of sex research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329300600304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that child sexual offenders' self-report can provide a reliable source of information regarding offenders' use of threats and violence. However, the majority of studies in this area have specifically focused on coercion occurring within sexually abusive acts. The current investigation examined the accuracy of offenders' self-report regarding their use of threats and violence with child and adolescent victims during two time periods: (1) while attempting to secure victims' cooperation in sexual activities; and (2) while seeking to maintain victims' silence regarding the abuse. The responses of 16 offenders in an incarcerated treatment setting and 16 in an outpatient treatment program were compared with treatment staff's responses on an anonymous questionnaire. Findings generally indicated a high level of concordance between offender and staff reports. However, both groups of offenders significantly under-reported their use of threats and violence for both time periods. While some of the under-reported items reflected overt forms of violence (e.g., forced participation), the majority represented subtle, manipulative, and/or implied threats. Implications for future studies and clinical applications are discussed.
评估儿童性犯罪者的作案手法:自我报告使用威胁和胁迫的准确性
最近的证据表明,儿童性犯罪者的自我报告可以提供有关犯罪者使用威胁和暴力的可靠信息来源。然而,这一领域的大多数研究都特别关注性虐待行为中的强迫行为。目前的调查研究了罪犯在两个时间段内对儿童和青少年受害者使用威胁和暴力的自我报告的准确性:(1)试图在性活动中获得受害者的合作;(2)同时寻求保持受害者对虐待的沉默。16名在监禁治疗环境中的罪犯和16名在门诊治疗项目中的罪犯的回答与治疗人员在匿名问卷上的回答进行了比较。调查结果普遍表明,罪犯和工作人员的报告高度一致。然而,两组罪犯在两个时间段内都严重低估了他们使用威胁和暴力的情况。虽然一些报告不足的项目反映了公开的暴力形式(例如,强迫参与),但大多数代表了微妙的、操纵的和/或隐含的威胁。对未来研究和临床应用的意义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信