Wave – particle duality interpretation: de brogile equation criticisms

Alois Matorevhu
{"title":"Wave – particle duality interpretation: de brogile equation criticisms","authors":"Alois Matorevhu","doi":"10.15406/PAIJ.2020.04.00223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the historical development of quantum theory, wave – particle duality has been one of the guiding concepts in intensive debates on the quantum theory. Variations in interpretations of the wave – duality result in different meanings, hence lack of consensus among physicists. This paper sought to analyse the variations in interpreting the wave – particle duality. To achieve this, various theoretical arguments, experimental results and their interpretations were analysed. It was found that based on one’s philosophical position the purpose of interpreting the wave – particle duality could be predicting or explaining phenomena or making a reality claim in a hidden structure or the process of nature. This analysis revealed that particles and waves are mutually exclusive in classical physics, since they exhibit different behaviours. In quantum mechanics, as postulated by de Broglie both the particle and wave behaviours are embedded in matter, but they cannot be simultaneously exhibited. While de Broglie is applauded for a break through which provided knowledge for guiding further development of quantum mechanics, criticisms which need attention have been highlighted in this paper. It is concluded from the analysis that the complexity of interpretation of the wave – particle duality is a fact, which is an indication that debates related to interpretation of the wave – particle duality, and specifically de Broglie equation, will not end in a foreseeable future. Therefore in order to bring more insight, physicists should continue debating these issues as well as putting effort to provide experimental evidence, to substantiate claims.","PeriodicalId":137635,"journal":{"name":"Physics & Astronomy International Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics & Astronomy International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/PAIJ.2020.04.00223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the historical development of quantum theory, wave – particle duality has been one of the guiding concepts in intensive debates on the quantum theory. Variations in interpretations of the wave – duality result in different meanings, hence lack of consensus among physicists. This paper sought to analyse the variations in interpreting the wave – particle duality. To achieve this, various theoretical arguments, experimental results and their interpretations were analysed. It was found that based on one’s philosophical position the purpose of interpreting the wave – particle duality could be predicting or explaining phenomena or making a reality claim in a hidden structure or the process of nature. This analysis revealed that particles and waves are mutually exclusive in classical physics, since they exhibit different behaviours. In quantum mechanics, as postulated by de Broglie both the particle and wave behaviours are embedded in matter, but they cannot be simultaneously exhibited. While de Broglie is applauded for a break through which provided knowledge for guiding further development of quantum mechanics, criticisms which need attention have been highlighted in this paper. It is concluded from the analysis that the complexity of interpretation of the wave – particle duality is a fact, which is an indication that debates related to interpretation of the wave – particle duality, and specifically de Broglie equation, will not end in a foreseeable future. Therefore in order to bring more insight, physicists should continue debating these issues as well as putting effort to provide experimental evidence, to substantiate claims.
波粒二象性解释:德布罗吉尔方程批评
在量子理论的历史发展中,波粒二象性一直是量子理论激烈争论的指导概念之一。对波二象性的不同解释产生了不同的含义,因此物理学家之间缺乏共识。本文试图分析波粒二象性解释中的变化。为此,对各种理论论点、实验结果及其解释进行了分析。人们发现,基于一个人的哲学立场,解释波粒二象性的目的可以是预测或解释现象,或者在一个隐藏的结构或自然过程中提出一个现实的主张。这一分析揭示了粒子和波在经典物理学中是相互排斥的,因为它们表现出不同的行为。在量子力学中,正如德布罗意所假设的那样,粒子和波的行为都嵌入在物质中,但它们不能同时表现出来。虽然德布罗意的突破为指导量子力学的进一步发展提供了知识,但他也强调了一些需要注意的批评。从分析中得出结论,波粒二象性解释的复杂性是一个事实,这表明与波粒二象性解释有关的争论,特别是德布罗意方程,在可预见的将来不会结束。因此,为了带来更多的见解,物理学家应该继续讨论这些问题,并努力提供实验证据,以证实这些说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信