定量的PET測定に用いる測定器の信頼性 -電離箱式放射能測定装置,ウェル型シンチレーションカウンタ,持続動脈血中放射能濃度測定器およびPET装置の評価-

圭一 松本, 誠一 山本, 康弘 和田, 敬二 清水, 研也 村瀬, 道雄 千田
{"title":"定量的PET測定に用いる測定器の信頼性 -電離箱式放射能測定装置,ウェル型シンチレーションカウンタ,持続動脈血中放射能濃度測定器およびPET装置の評価-","authors":"圭一 松本, 誠一 山本, 康弘 和田, 敬二 清水, 研也 村瀬, 道雄 千田","doi":"10.6009/JJRT.64.1227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful tool for measuring in vivo functions such as blood flow, metabolism, enzyme activity, receptors, and transporters. However, plural measuring instruments (i.e., the dose-calibrator, the auto well gamma counter, the continuous blood sampling system) are necessary for the quantitative PET measurement as well as the PET scanner. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of plural measuring instruments from the maintenance data for 6 years. Methods: Four kinds of measuring instrument were evaluated: a dose-calibrator (CAPINTEC, CRC-15R), an auto well gamma counter (ALOKA, ARC-400), a continuous blood sampling system (ESPEC Techno, PH type), and a dedicated PET scanner (Siemens, ECAT EXACT HR+). We examined whether the initial performance for system sensitivity is maintained. The reliability of the PET scanner was evaluated from the value of mean time between failures (MTBF) for each part of the system obtained from the maintenance data for 6 years. Results: The sensitivity of a dose-calibrator and an auto well gamma counter were maintained virtually constant during the 6 years, but the sensitivity of a continuous blood sampling system was 0.1±3.2%. The sensitivity of a PET scanner was decreased to 92.3% of the initial value. Fifty-one percent of the problems with the PET scanner were for detector block (DB) and analog processor (AP) board. The MTBF of DB and AP board module were 199 and 244 days, respectively. The MTBF of the PET scanner was 56 days. Conclusion: The performance of three measuring instruments, excepting the PET scanner, was relatively stable. The reliability of the PET scanner strongly depends on the MTBF of the DB and AP board. For quantitative PET measurement, it is effective to evaluate the reliability of the system and to make it known to the users.","PeriodicalId":393304,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/JJRT.64.1227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful tool for measuring in vivo functions such as blood flow, metabolism, enzyme activity, receptors, and transporters. However, plural measuring instruments (i.e., the dose-calibrator, the auto well gamma counter, the continuous blood sampling system) are necessary for the quantitative PET measurement as well as the PET scanner. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of plural measuring instruments from the maintenance data for 6 years. Methods: Four kinds of measuring instrument were evaluated: a dose-calibrator (CAPINTEC, CRC-15R), an auto well gamma counter (ALOKA, ARC-400), a continuous blood sampling system (ESPEC Techno, PH type), and a dedicated PET scanner (Siemens, ECAT EXACT HR+). We examined whether the initial performance for system sensitivity is maintained. The reliability of the PET scanner was evaluated from the value of mean time between failures (MTBF) for each part of the system obtained from the maintenance data for 6 years. Results: The sensitivity of a dose-calibrator and an auto well gamma counter were maintained virtually constant during the 6 years, but the sensitivity of a continuous blood sampling system was 0.1±3.2%. The sensitivity of a PET scanner was decreased to 92.3% of the initial value. Fifty-one percent of the problems with the PET scanner were for detector block (DB) and analog processor (AP) board. The MTBF of DB and AP board module were 199 and 244 days, respectively. The MTBF of the PET scanner was 56 days. Conclusion: The performance of three measuring instruments, excepting the PET scanner, was relatively stable. The reliability of the PET scanner strongly depends on the MTBF of the DB and AP board. For quantitative PET measurement, it is effective to evaluate the reliability of the system and to make it known to the users.
定量PET测定所使用的测定器的可靠性-电离箱式放射能测定装置,阱型消辐射计数器,持续动脉血中放射能浓度测定器及PET装置的评价-
目的:正电子发射断层扫描(PET)是测量体内功能的有力工具,如血流量,代谢,酶活性,受体和转运体。然而,定量PET测量需要多种测量仪器(即剂量校准器、自动井伽马计数器、连续血液采样系统)以及PET扫描仪。本研究的目的是从6年的维护数据中探讨多重测量仪器的可靠性。方法:评估4种测量仪器:剂量校准器(CAPINTEC, CRC-15R)、自动井伽马计数器(ALOKA, ARC-400)、连续采血系统(ESPEC Techno, PH型)和专用PET扫描仪(Siemens, ECAT EXACT HR+)。我们检查了系统灵敏度的初始性能是否保持不变。PET扫描仪的可靠性是通过6年的维护数据获得的系统各部分的平均故障间隔时间(MTBF)来评估的。结果:剂量校准器和自动井伽马计数器的灵敏度在6年内基本保持不变,而连续采血系统的灵敏度为0.1±3.2%。PET扫描仪的灵敏度降至初始值的92.3%。PET扫描仪51%的问题是检测块(DB)和模拟处理器(AP)板。DB和AP板模块的MTBF分别为199天和244天。PET扫描的MTBF为56天。结论:除PET扫描仪外,三种测量仪器的性能都比较稳定。PET扫描仪的可靠性很大程度上取决于DB和AP板的MTBF。对于PET的定量测量,有效地评估了系统的可靠性,并使其为用户所知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信