Views on the Likelihood of Financial Crisis

B. Friedman
{"title":"Views on the Likelihood of Financial Crisis","authors":"B. Friedman","doi":"10.3386/W3407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A review of major lines of thinking about developments in the 1980s bearing on the likelihood of a financial crisis in the United States supports four principal conclusions: First, financial crises have historically played a major role in large fluctuations in business activity. A financial crisis has occurred either just prior to, or at the inception of, each of the half dozen or so most severe recorded declines in U.S. economic activity. Second, the proclivity 6f private borrowers to take on debt since 1980 has been extraordinary by postwar standards. Among business corporations, much of the proceeds of this surge in debt issuance has gone to pay down equity (either the borrower's or another company's) rather than to put in place new earning assets. Third, the rate at which U.S. businesses have gone bankrupt and defaulted on their liabilities has also been far out of line with any prior experience since the 1930's. The business failure rate not only rose to a postwar record level during the 1981-82 recession but -- in contradiction to prior cyclical patterns -- continued to rise through the first four years of the ensuing recovery. Fourth, the largest U.S. banks' exposure to debt issued in the course of leveraged buy-outs or other transactions substituting debt for equity capitalization now exceeds their risk-adjusted capital, even with all bank assets (including loans to developing countries) counted at book value. Although this exposure is not (yet) as large as that due to banks' LDC loans, the two sets of risks are not independent. If these trends of the 1980s together comprise an increase in the economy's financial fragility, they increase the likelihood that the government -- including, but not limited to, the Federal Reserve System -- will have to act in its capacity as lender of last resort, and also the likely magnitude of lender-of-last-resort action should such be necessary. If the exercise of this responsibility does become necessary, doing so in a fashion consistent with other Federal Reserve objectives, like maintaining price stability, will be problematic to say the least.","PeriodicalId":111845,"journal":{"name":"NBER: Historical Development of the American Economy (Topic)","volume":"583 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NBER: Historical Development of the American Economy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W3407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

A review of major lines of thinking about developments in the 1980s bearing on the likelihood of a financial crisis in the United States supports four principal conclusions: First, financial crises have historically played a major role in large fluctuations in business activity. A financial crisis has occurred either just prior to, or at the inception of, each of the half dozen or so most severe recorded declines in U.S. economic activity. Second, the proclivity 6f private borrowers to take on debt since 1980 has been extraordinary by postwar standards. Among business corporations, much of the proceeds of this surge in debt issuance has gone to pay down equity (either the borrower's or another company's) rather than to put in place new earning assets. Third, the rate at which U.S. businesses have gone bankrupt and defaulted on their liabilities has also been far out of line with any prior experience since the 1930's. The business failure rate not only rose to a postwar record level during the 1981-82 recession but -- in contradiction to prior cyclical patterns -- continued to rise through the first four years of the ensuing recovery. Fourth, the largest U.S. banks' exposure to debt issued in the course of leveraged buy-outs or other transactions substituting debt for equity capitalization now exceeds their risk-adjusted capital, even with all bank assets (including loans to developing countries) counted at book value. Although this exposure is not (yet) as large as that due to banks' LDC loans, the two sets of risks are not independent. If these trends of the 1980s together comprise an increase in the economy's financial fragility, they increase the likelihood that the government -- including, but not limited to, the Federal Reserve System -- will have to act in its capacity as lender of last resort, and also the likely magnitude of lender-of-last-resort action should such be necessary. If the exercise of this responsibility does become necessary, doing so in a fashion consistent with other Federal Reserve objectives, like maintaining price stability, will be problematic to say the least.
对金融危机可能性的看法
对1980年代与美国发生金融危机可能性有关的发展的主要思路进行审查,可以得出四个主要结论:第一,金融危机历来在商业活动的大幅波动中发挥了重要作用。金融危机要么发生在美国经济活动有记录以来最严重的六次衰退之前,要么发生在衰退之初。其次,以战后标准衡量,私人借款人自1980年以来的举债倾向非同寻常。在商业公司中,债务发行激增的大部分收益被用于偿还股本(要么是借款人的,要么是另一家公司的),而不是用于建立新的盈利资产。第三,自20世纪30年代以来,美国企业破产和债务违约的速度也远远超出了以往的任何经验。企业失败率不仅在1981-82年经济衰退期间升至战后最高水平,而且在随后经济复苏的头4年里继续上升——这与之前的周期性模式相悖。第四,美国最大的银行在杠杆收购或其他以债务代替股本的交易过程中所发行的债务敞口,现在超过了它们的风险调整资本,即使所有银行资产(包括对发展中国家的贷款)都以账面价值计算。尽管这种风险敞口(目前)还没有银行最不发达国家贷款的风险敞口那么大,但这两类风险并不是独立的。如果20世纪80年代的这些趋势共同构成了经济金融脆弱性的增加,它们增加了政府(包括但不限于联邦储备系统)不得不以最后贷款人的身份行事的可能性,以及在必要时采取最后贷款人行动的可能规模。如果确实有必要履行这一职责,那么以一种与美联储其他目标(如维持价格稳定)一致的方式履行这一职责,退一步说,将是有问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书