Educational Rights and Latinos: Tracking as a Form of Second Generation Discrimination

P. Noguera
{"title":"Educational Rights and Latinos: Tracking as a Form of Second Generation Discrimination","authors":"P. Noguera","doi":"10.15779/Z38Z955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cumulative effects of civil rights laws and policies have substantially eliminated official forms of racial discrimination. However, new forms of bias and discrimination remain firmly intact in institutional practices and procedures.' Moreover, due to their more subtle nature, these insidious forms of racial discrimination constitute barriers to racial justice that are in many ways more difficult to overcome. This is particularly true for Latinos in the area of educational rights. Past efforts to promote civil rights in education focused on issues of access through desegregation of the public schools,2 and to a lesser extent a more equal distribution of resources.3 Current efforts focus on different issues including tracking, the cultural content of curriculum, language rights, educational leadership, and representation.4 Although fundamental principles of fairness and equity remain central to the new civil rights agenda, new complex and controversial issues arise, issues which may be much more difficult to address than the official forms of discrimination targeted by past civil rights efforts. Several important differences between the past and present civil rights struggles in education must be understood. First, the civil rights efforts of the previous generation aimed at eliminating overt forms of blatant dis-","PeriodicalId":408518,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","volume":"162 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38Z955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The cumulative effects of civil rights laws and policies have substantially eliminated official forms of racial discrimination. However, new forms of bias and discrimination remain firmly intact in institutional practices and procedures.' Moreover, due to their more subtle nature, these insidious forms of racial discrimination constitute barriers to racial justice that are in many ways more difficult to overcome. This is particularly true for Latinos in the area of educational rights. Past efforts to promote civil rights in education focused on issues of access through desegregation of the public schools,2 and to a lesser extent a more equal distribution of resources.3 Current efforts focus on different issues including tracking, the cultural content of curriculum, language rights, educational leadership, and representation.4 Although fundamental principles of fairness and equity remain central to the new civil rights agenda, new complex and controversial issues arise, issues which may be much more difficult to address than the official forms of discrimination targeted by past civil rights efforts. Several important differences between the past and present civil rights struggles in education must be understood. First, the civil rights efforts of the previous generation aimed at eliminating overt forms of blatant dis-
教育权利与拉丁裔:追踪作为第二代歧视的一种形式
民权法律和政策的累积效应已经大大消除了官方形式的种族歧视。然而,在制度实践和程序中,新形式的偏见和歧视仍然岿然不动。”此外,由于其更微妙的性质,这些阴险的种族歧视形式构成了种族正义的障碍,在许多方面更难以克服。在教育权利方面,拉丁美洲人尤其如此。过去促进教育方面的公民权利的努力集中于通过废除公立学校的种族隔离(2)和在较小程度上更平等地分配资源(3)来获得教育机会的问题目前的努力集中在不同的问题上,包括跟踪、课程的文化内容、语言权利、教育领导和代表性虽然公平和平等的基本原则仍然是新的民权议程的核心,但出现了新的复杂和有争议的问题,这些问题可能比过去民权努力所针对的官方形式的歧视更难解决。必须了解过去和现在在教育方面的民权斗争之间的几个重要区别。首先,上一代人的民权努力旨在消除公然歧视的公开形式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信