Varun Vasudev, Lode De Paepe, Andrew D. A. Maidment, T. Kimpe, L. Platisa, W. Philips, P. Bakic
{"title":"Effects of smartphone sensor characteristics on dermatoscopic images: a simulation study","authors":"Varun Vasudev, Lode De Paepe, Andrew D. A. Maidment, T. Kimpe, L. Platisa, W. Philips, P. Bakic","doi":"10.1117/12.2582043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dermatoscopes are commonly used to evaluate skin lesions. The rising incidence of \nskin cancer has led to a wide array of medical imaging devices entering the market, some of which provide the \npatient the ability to analyze skin lesions themselves. They usually come in the form of smartphone attachments \nor mobile applications that leverage the optics of the smartphone to acquire the image; and in some cases, even \ngive a preliminary diagnosis. In this digital age these devices look to ease the burden of having to visit a \ndermatologist multiple times. While these attachments are no doubt very useful, the image sensors used within \nsmartphones are limited in terms of how much information they can process and effectively output to the user. \nSmartphone sensors are also very small which can result in a less detailed image as opposed to one from a \nprofessional camera. Our work is focused on the analysis of the information lost due to the known limitations of \nsmartphone sensors, and its effect on the image appearance. This analysis has been performed using a virtual \nsimulation pipeline for dermatology called VCT-Derma, which contains a module for a proprietary dermatoscope \nwhose optical stack parameters will be adapted to the smartphone sensor specifications mentioned in this \nmanuscript. This manuscript also describes the necessary sensor parameters required for adapting the \nsimulation model, the software used along with any assumptions made, perceived differences in the resulting \nimages, as well as the direction of the ongoing work.","PeriodicalId":199502,"journal":{"name":"Medical Imaging 2021: Physics of Medical Imaging","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Imaging 2021: Physics of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2582043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dermatoscopes are commonly used to evaluate skin lesions. The rising incidence of
skin cancer has led to a wide array of medical imaging devices entering the market, some of which provide the
patient the ability to analyze skin lesions themselves. They usually come in the form of smartphone attachments
or mobile applications that leverage the optics of the smartphone to acquire the image; and in some cases, even
give a preliminary diagnosis. In this digital age these devices look to ease the burden of having to visit a
dermatologist multiple times. While these attachments are no doubt very useful, the image sensors used within
smartphones are limited in terms of how much information they can process and effectively output to the user.
Smartphone sensors are also very small which can result in a less detailed image as opposed to one from a
professional camera. Our work is focused on the analysis of the information lost due to the known limitations of
smartphone sensors, and its effect on the image appearance. This analysis has been performed using a virtual
simulation pipeline for dermatology called VCT-Derma, which contains a module for a proprietary dermatoscope
whose optical stack parameters will be adapted to the smartphone sensor specifications mentioned in this
manuscript. This manuscript also describes the necessary sensor parameters required for adapting the
simulation model, the software used along with any assumptions made, perceived differences in the resulting
images, as well as the direction of the ongoing work.