On the Evaluation Measures for Machine Learning Algorithms for Safety-Critical Systems

M. Gharib, A. Bondavalli
{"title":"On the Evaluation Measures for Machine Learning Algorithms for Safety-Critical Systems","authors":"M. Gharib, A. Bondavalli","doi":"10.1109/EDCC.2019.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to learn and work with incomplete knowledge has motivated many system manufacturers to include such algorithms in their products. However, some of these systems can be described as Safety-Critical Systems (SCS) since their failure may cause injury or even death to humans. Therefore, the performance of ML algorithms with respect to the safety requirements of such systems must be evaluated before they are used in their operational environment. Although there exist several measures that can be used for evaluating the performance of ML algorithms, most of these measures focus mainly on some properties of interest in the domains where they were developed. For example, Recall, Precision and F-Factor are, usually, used in Information Retrieval (IR) domain, and they mainly focus on correct predictions with less emphasis on incorrect predictions, which are very important in SCS. Accordingly, such measures need to be tuned to fit the needs for evaluating the safe performance of ML algorithms. This position paper presents the authors’ view on the inadequacy of existing measures, and it proposes a new set of measures to be used for the evaluation of the safe performance of ML algorithms.","PeriodicalId":334498,"journal":{"name":"2019 15th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)","volume":"600 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 15th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDCC.2019.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The ability of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to learn and work with incomplete knowledge has motivated many system manufacturers to include such algorithms in their products. However, some of these systems can be described as Safety-Critical Systems (SCS) since their failure may cause injury or even death to humans. Therefore, the performance of ML algorithms with respect to the safety requirements of such systems must be evaluated before they are used in their operational environment. Although there exist several measures that can be used for evaluating the performance of ML algorithms, most of these measures focus mainly on some properties of interest in the domains where they were developed. For example, Recall, Precision and F-Factor are, usually, used in Information Retrieval (IR) domain, and they mainly focus on correct predictions with less emphasis on incorrect predictions, which are very important in SCS. Accordingly, such measures need to be tuned to fit the needs for evaluating the safe performance of ML algorithms. This position paper presents the authors’ view on the inadequacy of existing measures, and it proposes a new set of measures to be used for the evaluation of the safe performance of ML algorithms.
安全关键系统机器学习算法评价方法研究
机器学习(ML)算法在不完全知识下学习和工作的能力促使许多系统制造商将这种算法纳入其产品中。然而,其中一些系统可以被描述为安全关键系统(SCS),因为它们的故障可能导致人类受伤甚至死亡。因此,在将机器学习算法用于其操作环境之前,必须评估它们在此类系统的安全要求方面的性能。尽管存在一些可用于评估ML算法性能的度量,但这些度量中的大多数主要集中在它们开发的领域中感兴趣的一些属性。例如,在信息检索(Information Retrieval, IR)领域中,通常使用召回率(Recall)、精确率(Precision)和f因子(F-Factor),它们主要关注正确的预测,而不太关注错误的预测,这在信息检索中是非常重要的。因此,这些措施需要调整以适应评估ML算法安全性能的需要。本立场文件提出了作者对现有措施的不足之处的看法,并提出了一套新的措施,用于评估ML算法的安全性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信