A Knowledge-Based Artificial Intelligence Approach to Risk Management

Javier Canon, Theresa Broussard, A. Johnson, W. Singletary, Lolymar Colmenares-Diaz
{"title":"A Knowledge-Based Artificial Intelligence Approach to Risk Management","authors":"Javier Canon, Theresa Broussard, A. Johnson, W. Singletary, Lolymar Colmenares-Diaz","doi":"10.2118/210303-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper details experiences gained while developing a novel technology-driven approach to Risk Assessment methodologies, e.g., Process Hazard Analysis (PHA), Hazard Identification (HAZID) and Hazard Operability (HAZOP), in oil & gas. Emphasis has been placed on combining encoded human knowledge with Artificial Intelligence techniques, in a way which fosters safer designs and operations, while maintaining Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) at the center of decision making.\n Encoding of human knowledge (e.g., Subject Matter Expertise, Industry best practices) in digital applications has traditionally been associated with creating static pieces of information, such as lessons learned documentation and validation activities for hazard analysis. New digital technologies, however, make it possible to create truly dynamic knowledge representations, which capture key concepts and their relationships, creating a new type of \"source of truth.\" As a result, corporate and external knowledge can be made more readily accessible to engineers and operations personnel participating in decision making.\n Digital corporate knowledge can also be supplemented with Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques which can help uncover latent threats and better guide optimal decision making. This is particularly relevant in Workforce, Health & Safety (WH&S) and Process Safety contexts, where the impact of flawed or suboptimal decisions can lead to catastrophic consequences.\n Practical examples from an oil & gas major show how the risk assessment domain can be represented in a computational knowledge graph, in a format which is comprehensible not only to software developers, but more importantly, to oil & gas SMEs. A presentation of different AI techniques overlaid on top of this computational knowledge graph, can also offer a glimpse of the possibilities of marrying SME expertise with emerging digital technologies.","PeriodicalId":113697,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210303-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper details experiences gained while developing a novel technology-driven approach to Risk Assessment methodologies, e.g., Process Hazard Analysis (PHA), Hazard Identification (HAZID) and Hazard Operability (HAZOP), in oil & gas. Emphasis has been placed on combining encoded human knowledge with Artificial Intelligence techniques, in a way which fosters safer designs and operations, while maintaining Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) at the center of decision making. Encoding of human knowledge (e.g., Subject Matter Expertise, Industry best practices) in digital applications has traditionally been associated with creating static pieces of information, such as lessons learned documentation and validation activities for hazard analysis. New digital technologies, however, make it possible to create truly dynamic knowledge representations, which capture key concepts and their relationships, creating a new type of "source of truth." As a result, corporate and external knowledge can be made more readily accessible to engineers and operations personnel participating in decision making. Digital corporate knowledge can also be supplemented with Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques which can help uncover latent threats and better guide optimal decision making. This is particularly relevant in Workforce, Health & Safety (WH&S) and Process Safety contexts, where the impact of flawed or suboptimal decisions can lead to catastrophic consequences. Practical examples from an oil & gas major show how the risk assessment domain can be represented in a computational knowledge graph, in a format which is comprehensible not only to software developers, but more importantly, to oil & gas SMEs. A presentation of different AI techniques overlaid on top of this computational knowledge graph, can also offer a glimpse of the possibilities of marrying SME expertise with emerging digital technologies.
基于知识的人工智能风险管理方法
本文详细介绍了在开发一种新的技术驱动的风险评估方法(例如,过程危害分析(PHA)、危害识别(HAZID)和危害可操作性(HAZOP))过程中获得的经验。重点是将编码的人类知识与人工智能技术相结合,以促进更安全的设计和操作,同时保持主题专家(sme)在决策的中心地位。数字应用程序中人类知识的编码(例如,主题专业知识,行业最佳实践)传统上与创建静态信息片段相关,例如经验教训文档和危害分析的验证活动。然而,新的数字技术使创造真正动态的知识表示成为可能,这些表示捕捉关键概念及其关系,创造一种新型的“真理来源”。因此,参与决策的工程师和操作人员可以更容易地获得公司和外部知识。数字化的企业知识还可以辅以人工智能(AI)技术,这有助于发现潜在的威胁,并更好地指导最佳决策。这在劳动力、健康与安全(WH&S)和过程安全环境中尤其相关,在这些环境中,有缺陷或次优决策的影响可能导致灾难性后果。来自石油和天然气专业的实际示例显示了如何在计算知识图中表示风险评估领域,其格式不仅对软件开发人员来说是可理解的,更重要的是,对石油和天然气中小企业来说。不同人工智能技术的展示叠加在这个计算知识图之上,也可以让我们看到将中小企业的专业知识与新兴数字技术结合起来的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信