Book review: Integration: A Conversation Between Theological Education and the Letters to Timothy and Titus by David C. Wright

Ok-Joo Jeon
{"title":"Book review: Integration: A Conversation Between Theological Education and the Letters to Timothy and Titus by David C. Wright","authors":"Ok-Joo Jeon","doi":"10.1177/07398913231158173i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the dominant voices in our Christian cultural engagement. But the term “engaging culture” (a term used in the book’s subtitle) is a bit fabricated. It assumes a culture that exists “out there,” and we engage it. The problem is that culture has engaged us before we evaluate it. And so, Bailey wisely guides the reader into discernment rather than the mere evaluation of ideas (i.e., this is good vs. this is bad). Beckoning proverbs, Bailey writes “rightly discerning between the voices (of wisdom and folly) requires us to become a particular kind of person” (p. 7). As such, evaluating the cultural landscape is less a matter of content and more a matter of who’s discernment are we using. Like Paul at the Aerogapus in Acts 17, the gospel comes not as a rejection of culture (“your poems are bad”) or a replacement of culture (“here’s some better poems”) but the fulfillment of culture (“your poems point to something true and good fulfilled in Jesus”). Rather than the stale categories we often inherit in contemporary Christianity, Bailey provides the reader with several lenses on how Christians can more faithfully discern culture. These same categories can apply to Christian ministry and faith integration, as well. Rather than having to reject movies or songs, these five lenses can help us learn something from cultural artifacts. Or rather than having to replace “secular” learning theories from those who aren’t of the Christian faith sources, we can point to the good, true, and beautiful and lead others to see the fullness of Christian theology. I appreciate the range of sources and topics from which Bailey draws. He is theologically and philosophically indiscriminate (a virtue in my eyes). He celebrates truth wherever it is found, which seems to be modeling the posture toward a culture that he recommends throughout the book. Because of his wide range, his approach is dynamic. Bailey attempts to bridge the world of culture and theology in dynamic ways. Striking a balance of what I’ll call “accessibly deep”—he uses complex ideas but explains the in understandable ways—Justin Bailey has written a perceptive work on how exactly we are meant to interpret our world. *A version of this review was originally published in a newsletter from FareForward. http://farefwd.com/index.php/2022/11/30/interpreting-your-world","PeriodicalId":135435,"journal":{"name":"Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07398913231158173i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the dominant voices in our Christian cultural engagement. But the term “engaging culture” (a term used in the book’s subtitle) is a bit fabricated. It assumes a culture that exists “out there,” and we engage it. The problem is that culture has engaged us before we evaluate it. And so, Bailey wisely guides the reader into discernment rather than the mere evaluation of ideas (i.e., this is good vs. this is bad). Beckoning proverbs, Bailey writes “rightly discerning between the voices (of wisdom and folly) requires us to become a particular kind of person” (p. 7). As such, evaluating the cultural landscape is less a matter of content and more a matter of who’s discernment are we using. Like Paul at the Aerogapus in Acts 17, the gospel comes not as a rejection of culture (“your poems are bad”) or a replacement of culture (“here’s some better poems”) but the fulfillment of culture (“your poems point to something true and good fulfilled in Jesus”). Rather than the stale categories we often inherit in contemporary Christianity, Bailey provides the reader with several lenses on how Christians can more faithfully discern culture. These same categories can apply to Christian ministry and faith integration, as well. Rather than having to reject movies or songs, these five lenses can help us learn something from cultural artifacts. Or rather than having to replace “secular” learning theories from those who aren’t of the Christian faith sources, we can point to the good, true, and beautiful and lead others to see the fullness of Christian theology. I appreciate the range of sources and topics from which Bailey draws. He is theologically and philosophically indiscriminate (a virtue in my eyes). He celebrates truth wherever it is found, which seems to be modeling the posture toward a culture that he recommends throughout the book. Because of his wide range, his approach is dynamic. Bailey attempts to bridge the world of culture and theology in dynamic ways. Striking a balance of what I’ll call “accessibly deep”—he uses complex ideas but explains the in understandable ways—Justin Bailey has written a perceptive work on how exactly we are meant to interpret our world. *A version of this review was originally published in a newsletter from FareForward. http://farefwd.com/index.php/2022/11/30/interpreting-your-world
书评:《整合:神学教育与提摩太书和提多书的对话》,作者:大卫·c·赖特
在我们的基督教文化参与中占主导地位的声音。但是,“引人入胜的文化”这个词(书的副标题中使用了这个词)有点虚构。它假设一种文化存在于“外面”,我们参与其中。问题是,文化在我们评估它之前就已经吸引了我们。因此,贝利明智地引导读者进行辨别,而不仅仅是对观点的评价(例如,这是好的,这是坏的)。贝利引用了一些谚语,他写道:“正确地分辨(智慧和愚蠢的)声音需要我们成为一种特殊的人”(第7页)。因此,评估文化景观不是内容的问题,而是我们使用谁的洞察力的问题。就像使徒行传17章中保罗在气加加普的演讲一样,福音不是作为对文化的拒绝(“你的诗是坏的”)或文化的替代(“这里有一些更好的诗”),而是文化的实现(“你的诗指向在耶稣身上实现的真实和美好的东西”)。与我们在当代基督教中经常继承的陈腐分类不同,贝利为读者提供了几个关于基督徒如何更忠实地辨别文化的镜头。同样的分类也适用于基督教的事工和信仰整合。与其拒绝电影或歌曲,这五个镜头可以帮助我们从文化文物中学习一些东西。或者,我们可以指出善、真、美,并带领别人看到基督教神学的全貌,而不是从那些非基督教信仰来源的人那里取代“世俗”的学习理论。我很欣赏贝利的资料来源和主题范围。他在神学和哲学上不分青红皂白(在我看来是一种美德)。无论真理在哪里被发现,他都会赞美它,这似乎是他在整本书中所推荐的一种文化的模式。因为他的范围很广,他的方法是动态的。贝利试图以动态的方式架起文化和神学世界的桥梁。justin Bailey在我称之为“可理解的深度”(使用复杂的想法,但以可理解的方式解释)之间取得了平衡,他写了一本关于我们应该如何准确地解释我们的世界的敏锐作品。*本评论的一个版本最初发表在FareForward的通讯中。http://farefwd.com/index.php/2022/11/30/interpreting-your-world
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信