Engaged Anthropology and an Ethnographic Approach to Community Development: A Case Study from Tamil Nadu

S. Sumathi, G. Pandiaraj
{"title":"Engaged Anthropology and an Ethnographic Approach to Community Development: A Case Study from Tamil Nadu","authors":"S. Sumathi, G. Pandiaraj","doi":"10.14361/9783839451717-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the literature on engaged or public anthropology. Moreover, definitions of engagement have opened up to include a multiple number of ways and forms that anthropological work can be engage in community development—ranging from direct activism and critical deconstructions of dominant categories, to teaching. The scope of engagement in socio-cultural, economic and political issues dealt with by anthropologists has increased relatively in pluralistic societies such as India. The extent of what counts as engaged scholarship, moving towards an epistemic understanding that leads to relationships between subject knowledge and action/application, could be inherently politico-legal most of the time. In India,attention is drawn to such engaged scholarship of cultural anthropologists. They contribute through their ethnographic writings about the communities and their contemporary changing identities. Such alternative realities, open-ended epistemology and theoretical practical interpretation of ethnographies about marginalized communities, social identities and the claims made by those realities were jeopardizing Indian hierarchical society. The communities and their self-organizations protested against the government and sought privileges that could be provided constitutionally. Most of the time, the issue revolved around their claim about the ‘community name’ and nomenclature. The requests submitted to the authorities were negotiated, contested and ultimately required legal interventions. Since the issue is all about culture and social identity, the court regularly seeks anthropological inputs such as theoretical practices, reflexive discourse and more subtle or virtual form of intervention. This article attempts to shed light on the need for rejuvenating our understanding of the concept engaged or public anthropolog y, application of the basic ethnographic approach at the empirical level and other related concepts. The analytical interpretations were arrived at by taking the cases brought to the District Vigilance Committee and State Level Scrutiny Committee of Tamil Nadu constituted by the appellant judiciary intervention at the national level.","PeriodicalId":441090,"journal":{"name":"Southeast Asian Transformations","volume":"232 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast Asian Transformations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839451717-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the literature on engaged or public anthropology. Moreover, definitions of engagement have opened up to include a multiple number of ways and forms that anthropological work can be engage in community development—ranging from direct activism and critical deconstructions of dominant categories, to teaching. The scope of engagement in socio-cultural, economic and political issues dealt with by anthropologists has increased relatively in pluralistic societies such as India. The extent of what counts as engaged scholarship, moving towards an epistemic understanding that leads to relationships between subject knowledge and action/application, could be inherently politico-legal most of the time. In India,attention is drawn to such engaged scholarship of cultural anthropologists. They contribute through their ethnographic writings about the communities and their contemporary changing identities. Such alternative realities, open-ended epistemology and theoretical practical interpretation of ethnographies about marginalized communities, social identities and the claims made by those realities were jeopardizing Indian hierarchical society. The communities and their self-organizations protested against the government and sought privileges that could be provided constitutionally. Most of the time, the issue revolved around their claim about the ‘community name’ and nomenclature. The requests submitted to the authorities were negotiated, contested and ultimately required legal interventions. Since the issue is all about culture and social identity, the court regularly seeks anthropological inputs such as theoretical practices, reflexive discourse and more subtle or virtual form of intervention. This article attempts to shed light on the need for rejuvenating our understanding of the concept engaged or public anthropolog y, application of the basic ethnographic approach at the empirical level and other related concepts. The analytical interpretations were arrived at by taking the cases brought to the District Vigilance Committee and State Level Scrutiny Committee of Tamil Nadu constituted by the appellant judiciary intervention at the national level.
参与人类学与族群志研究社区发展:泰米尔纳德邦个案研究
近年来,关于订婚人类学或公共人类学的文献有了显著的增加。此外,参与的定义已经开放,包括多种方式和形式,人类学工作可以参与社区发展——从直接的行动主义和对主导类别的批判性解构,到教学。在印度这样的多元化社会中,人类学家处理的社会文化、经济和政治问题的参与范围相对增加了。从事学术研究的程度,向导致学科知识和行动/应用之间关系的认识论理解,在大多数时候可能本质上是政治-法律的。在印度,人们的注意力被吸引到文化人类学家的这种敬业的学术研究上。他们通过他们关于社区和他们当代不断变化的身份的民族志著作做出贡献。这种另类现实、开放式认识论和对民族志关于边缘化社区、社会身份和这些现实所提出的主张的理论实践解释正在危及印度的等级社会。社区和他们的自我组织抗议政府,并寻求宪法可以提供的特权。大多数时候,这个问题围绕着他们对“社区名称”和命名法的主张。提交给当局的请求经过谈判、争论,最终需要法律干预。由于这个问题都是关于文化和社会身份的,法院经常寻求人类学的输入,如理论实践,反身话语和更微妙或虚拟的干预形式。本文试图阐明我们对公共人类学概念的理解,以及在经验层面上应用基本人种学方法和其他相关概念的必要性。分析性解释是通过将提交给泰米尔纳德邦地区警戒委员会和邦一级审查委员会的案件进行处理而得出的,这些委员会是由上诉人在国家一级的司法干预组成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信