Management of Refractory Intracranial Hypotension Using Percutaneous Fibrin Sealant Patch – A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Kevin Wong
{"title":"Management of Refractory Intracranial Hypotension Using\nPercutaneous Fibrin Sealant Patch – A Case Series and Review\nof the Literature","authors":"Kevin Wong","doi":"10.36076/pmcr.2018/3/13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intracranial hypotension (IH) among\npatients with persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)\nleakage remains a challenging problem. The majority\nof these cases resolve spontaneously with\nconservative measures. The customary treatment\nfor IH is epidural blood patch (EBP). In some\ncases, CSF leaks can persist for months or even\nyears despite multiple trials of EBP. To date, there\nare only a limited number of published studies\ndocumenting the percutaneous injection of fibrin\nsealant for treatment of IH refractory to conservative\nmeasures and EBP.\nObjective: Our objective was to perform a literature\nreview and retrospective case series regarding\npatients who underwent percutaneous injection of\nfibrin sealant for treatment of refractory IH at our\ninstitution.\nStudy Design: This case series used a singlecentered\nretrospective observational study design\nand literature review.\nSetting: Patients in this case series were treated\nat a community-based tertiary care medical center.\nMethods: Five consecutive patients with the diagnosis\nof IH refractory to conservative measures\nand EBP who underwent percutaneous patching\nwith fibrin sealant were identified at our institution\nbetween January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2016. A\nretrospective chart review was performed and data\nincluding demographics, characteristics, interventions,\nclinical outcomes, and complications were\ncollected. A critical review of the current literature\nregarding the percutaneous use of fibrin sealant for\ntreatment of IH was conducted.\nResults: Four of the 5 patients (80%) experienced\nno further symptoms of IH and no adverse events\nwere noted. One patient (20%) ultimately required\nsurgical duroplasty. Review of the current literature\nshowed a total of 2 prospective case series,\n4 retrospective case series, and 11 case reports.\nOur present case series and literature review demonstrated\nthat fibrin sealants were well-tolerated by\nmost patients and associated with low incidences\nof complications and recurrence.\nLimitations: This study is limited by the small retrospective\ncase series of 5 patients.\nConclusions: Percutaneous injection of fibrin sealant\nmay be considered in refractory cases of IH\nwhen repeated trials of EBP have persistently failed.\nIt appears to be a highly effective, safe, and easy-touse\nalternative therapy for patients with refractory IH\nin an ambulatory setting. Our review of the literature\nrevealed only studies with low quality of evidence,\nincluding case series and case reports. There is a\nsubstantial need for high-quality studies and clinical\nevidence to corroborate the efficacy and safety of\nthis percutaneous technique. However, this ideal is\nvery challenging because of the relative rarity and\nheterogeneous etiologies of cases.\nKeywords: Fibrin sealant, intracranial hypotension,\nCSF leak, epidural blood patch, orthostatic\nheadache, refractory, quality of life, percutaneous","PeriodicalId":110696,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Case Reports","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2018/3/13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intracranial hypotension (IH) among patients with persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage remains a challenging problem. The majority of these cases resolve spontaneously with conservative measures. The customary treatment for IH is epidural blood patch (EBP). In some cases, CSF leaks can persist for months or even years despite multiple trials of EBP. To date, there are only a limited number of published studies documenting the percutaneous injection of fibrin sealant for treatment of IH refractory to conservative measures and EBP. Objective: Our objective was to perform a literature review and retrospective case series regarding patients who underwent percutaneous injection of fibrin sealant for treatment of refractory IH at our institution. Study Design: This case series used a singlecentered retrospective observational study design and literature review. Setting: Patients in this case series were treated at a community-based tertiary care medical center. Methods: Five consecutive patients with the diagnosis of IH refractory to conservative measures and EBP who underwent percutaneous patching with fibrin sealant were identified at our institution between January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2016. A retrospective chart review was performed and data including demographics, characteristics, interventions, clinical outcomes, and complications were collected. A critical review of the current literature regarding the percutaneous use of fibrin sealant for treatment of IH was conducted. Results: Four of the 5 patients (80%) experienced no further symptoms of IH and no adverse events were noted. One patient (20%) ultimately required surgical duroplasty. Review of the current literature showed a total of 2 prospective case series, 4 retrospective case series, and 11 case reports. Our present case series and literature review demonstrated that fibrin sealants were well-tolerated by most patients and associated with low incidences of complications and recurrence. Limitations: This study is limited by the small retrospective case series of 5 patients. Conclusions: Percutaneous injection of fibrin sealant may be considered in refractory cases of IH when repeated trials of EBP have persistently failed. It appears to be a highly effective, safe, and easy-touse alternative therapy for patients with refractory IH in an ambulatory setting. Our review of the literature revealed only studies with low quality of evidence, including case series and case reports. There is a substantial need for high-quality studies and clinical evidence to corroborate the efficacy and safety of this percutaneous technique. However, this ideal is very challenging because of the relative rarity and heterogeneous etiologies of cases. Keywords: Fibrin sealant, intracranial hypotension, CSF leak, epidural blood patch, orthostatic headache, refractory, quality of life, percutaneous
经皮纤维蛋白密封贴片治疗顽固性颅内低血压——病例系列及文献回顾
背景:持续性脑脊液(CSF)渗漏患者的颅内低血压(IH)仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。这些病例中的大多数通过保守措施自行解决。IH的常规治疗是硬膜外血贴(EBP)。在某些情况下,脑脊液泄漏可能持续数月甚至数年,尽管多次试验EBP。迄今为止,只有有限数量的已发表的研究记录了经皮注射纤维蛋白密封剂治疗保守措施和EBP难治性IH。目的:我们的目的是进行文献综述和回顾性病例系列,关于在我们机构接受经皮注射offin蛋白密封剂治疗难治性IH的患者。研究设计:本病例系列采用单中心回顾性观察性研究设计和文献综述。环境:本病例系列中的患者在社区三级保健医疗中心接受治疗。方法:2000年1月1日至2016年1月1日,连续5例诊断为IH的保守措施和EBP难治性患者接受了纤维蛋白密封剂经皮修补。进行回顾性图表回顾,收集包括人口统计学、特征、干预措施、临床结果和并发症在内的数据。对目前关于经皮使用纤维蛋白密封剂治疗IH的文献进行了综述。结果:5例患者中有4例(80%)没有出现进一步的IH症状,也没有出现不良事件。1例患者(20%)最终需要手术硬膜成形术。回顾目前的文献,共有2个前瞻性病例系列,4个回顾性病例系列和11个病例报告。我们目前的病例系列和文献综述表明,大多数患者对纤维蛋白密封剂耐受性良好,并发症和复发率低。局限性:本研究受限于5例患者的小型回顾性病例系列。结论:经皮注射纤维蛋白密封剂可用于难治性ih病例,反复试验的EBP持续失败。对于难治性IHin患者来说,它似乎是一种非常有效、安全、易于使用的替代疗法。我们对文献的回顾只发现了证据质量较低的研究,包括病例系列和病例报告。需要大量高质量的研究和临床证据来证实这种经皮技术的有效性和安全性。然而,由于病例的相对罕见性和异质性,这种理想是非常具有挑战性的。关键词:纤维蛋白密封剂,颅内低血压,脑脊液漏,硬膜外血贴,直立性头痛,难治性,生活质量,经皮
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信