Health-related quality of life in persons with long-term neck pain after treatment with qigong and exercise therapy respectively

B. Lansinger, J. Carlsson, M. Kreuter, C. Taft
{"title":"Health-related quality of life in persons with long-term neck pain after treatment with qigong and exercise therapy respectively","authors":"B. Lansinger, J. Carlsson, M. Kreuter, C. Taft","doi":"10.3109/21679169.2013.805816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aims of this study were to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals with long-term, non-specific neck pain before and after treatment with qigong versus exercise therapy and to compare their HRQoL with an age and sex-matched reference population. A total of 122 persons were randomly assigned to either qigong or exercise therapy. HRQoL was measured with the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and pain intensity was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) before and immediately after treatment, and at 12-month follow-up. Both treatment groups improved on all subscales; however, no differences were observed between the treatment groups either before or after treatment. Those who experienced pain relief (at least 10 mm change on VAS; 53%) also significantly improved from baseline on all SF-36 subscales. Persons with chronic neck pain had significantly lower scores on all SF-36 subscales than normative reference values both before and after treatment. The results of this study indicate no differences between qigong and exercise therapy in HRQoL outcome; however, broad HRQoL improvements seem to be contingent on significant pain reduction. As pain reduction was achieved in roughly half of the study group, more work is needed to refine these therapies, to identify neck pain persons most likely to benefit from them and to develop other physiotherapy treatment strategies suitable to non-responders.","PeriodicalId":186472,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/21679169.2013.805816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract The aims of this study were to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals with long-term, non-specific neck pain before and after treatment with qigong versus exercise therapy and to compare their HRQoL with an age and sex-matched reference population. A total of 122 persons were randomly assigned to either qigong or exercise therapy. HRQoL was measured with the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and pain intensity was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) before and immediately after treatment, and at 12-month follow-up. Both treatment groups improved on all subscales; however, no differences were observed between the treatment groups either before or after treatment. Those who experienced pain relief (at least 10 mm change on VAS; 53%) also significantly improved from baseline on all SF-36 subscales. Persons with chronic neck pain had significantly lower scores on all SF-36 subscales than normative reference values both before and after treatment. The results of this study indicate no differences between qigong and exercise therapy in HRQoL outcome; however, broad HRQoL improvements seem to be contingent on significant pain reduction. As pain reduction was achieved in roughly half of the study group, more work is needed to refine these therapies, to identify neck pain persons most likely to benefit from them and to develop other physiotherapy treatment strategies suitable to non-responders.
分别用气功和运动疗法治疗长期颈部疼痛患者的健康相关生活质量
摘要:本研究的目的是评估气功与运动治疗前后长期非特异性颈部疼痛患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL),并将其与年龄和性别匹配的参考人群进行比较。共有122人被随机分配到气功组或运动疗法组。采用36项健康问卷(SF-36)测量HRQoL,并在治疗前、治疗后及12个月随访时采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度。两个治疗组在所有亚量表上均有改善;然而,治疗组之间无论是治疗前还是治疗后都没有观察到差异。疼痛缓解者(VAS变化至少10mm;53%)的所有SF-36量表也较基线有显著改善。慢性颈部疼痛患者在治疗前后的SF-36量表得分均明显低于标准参考值。本研究结果显示气功与运动疗法在HRQoL结果上无差异;然而,广泛的HRQoL的改善似乎取决于显著的疼痛减轻。由于大约一半的研究组实现了疼痛减轻,需要做更多的工作来完善这些治疗方法,以确定最有可能从中受益的颈部疼痛患者,并制定适合无反应者的其他物理治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书