Identifying Significant Customer Opinion Information of Each Aspect from Hotel Reviews

J. Polpinij, Umaporn Saisangchan, Vorakit Vorakitphan, B. Luaphol
{"title":"Identifying Significant Customer Opinion Information of Each Aspect from Hotel Reviews","authors":"J. Polpinij, Umaporn Saisangchan, Vorakit Vorakitphan, B. Luaphol","doi":"10.1109/jcsse54890.2022.9836251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recognizing whether customers like or dislike a product or service from online reviews may not be sufficient for other customers to make decisions or for owners to improve their merchandising. This was taken up as a challenge in this study that focused on finding significant sentiment information from customer reviews on each hotel aspect. The proposed framework first separated customer reviews into sentences, and then assembled all customer review sentences relating to each aspect of customer reviews using the k-means clustering. Later, those customer sentences are classified them into positive and negative sentiment polarity classes. The classifier was developed by Support Vector Machines (SVM). This can help other customers or the owner to understand why customers like or dislike a particular hotel aspect. The experimental results were evaluated using recall, precision, F1 and accuracy. The clustering method returned satisfactory results of 0.81, 0.80, 0.80 and 0.80, respectively. Meanwhile, the classification method also gave satisfactory results at 0.81, 0.79, 0.80 and 0.79, respectively. Compared to the baseline using F1 and accuracy, our proposed method produces very similar experimental results to the baseline method but our proposed method requires less computational time than the baseline.","PeriodicalId":284735,"journal":{"name":"2022 19th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 19th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/jcsse54890.2022.9836251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recognizing whether customers like or dislike a product or service from online reviews may not be sufficient for other customers to make decisions or for owners to improve their merchandising. This was taken up as a challenge in this study that focused on finding significant sentiment information from customer reviews on each hotel aspect. The proposed framework first separated customer reviews into sentences, and then assembled all customer review sentences relating to each aspect of customer reviews using the k-means clustering. Later, those customer sentences are classified them into positive and negative sentiment polarity classes. The classifier was developed by Support Vector Machines (SVM). This can help other customers or the owner to understand why customers like or dislike a particular hotel aspect. The experimental results were evaluated using recall, precision, F1 and accuracy. The clustering method returned satisfactory results of 0.81, 0.80, 0.80 and 0.80, respectively. Meanwhile, the classification method also gave satisfactory results at 0.81, 0.79, 0.80 and 0.79, respectively. Compared to the baseline using F1 and accuracy, our proposed method produces very similar experimental results to the baseline method but our proposed method requires less computational time than the baseline.
从酒店评论中识别各方面的重要客户意见信息
从在线评论中认识到客户是否喜欢或不喜欢产品或服务,可能不足以让其他客户做出决定,也不足以让所有者改进他们的销售。这在本研究中被视为一个挑战,该研究侧重于从客户对酒店各个方面的评论中找到重要的情绪信息。该框架首先将客户评论分成句子,然后使用k-means聚类方法将与客户评论的各个方面相关的所有客户评论句子进行组合。然后,将这些客户句分为积极和消极情绪极性类。该分类器采用支持向量机(SVM)开发。这可以帮助其他顾客或业主了解顾客喜欢或不喜欢酒店某方面的原因。用查全率、查准率、F1和准确率对实验结果进行评价。聚类方法的结果分别为0.81、0.80、0.80和0.80。同时,分类方法也得到了令人满意的结果,分别为0.81、0.79、0.80和0.79。与使用F1和精度的基线相比,我们提出的方法产生的实验结果与基线方法非常相似,但我们提出的方法所需的计算时间比基线少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信