External Interventions and State Fragility, Failure and Collapse: Comparative Analysis of African Experiences

Embiale Beyene
{"title":"External Interventions and State Fragility, Failure and Collapse: Comparative Analysis of African Experiences","authors":"Embiale Beyene","doi":"10.7176/iags/88-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"States fragility, failure and collapse are the results of both domestic and external determinant factors. This article provides a critique of the debates of failing states, failed states, and collapsed states in Africa by examining three cases: DRC, Burundi, and Somalia. It tries to highlight the impacts of external interventions on functionality, viability and sovereignty of African states. It presents the various interventions and their impacts on state viability in Africa. It argued that by taking similar paths of intervention with the same logic of the past, it is difficult to solve problems related to state failures in Africa. Instead, there has to be a different path of the state-building process that takes into account Africa’s realities and the interest of the majority, not the interests of the elites and the donors. Besides, instead of focusing on the idea of the liberal peace theory of republicanism, cosmopolitanism, and a free-market economy, it is better to address state-society relations in Africa. Hence, Africa should import those devices and institutions that advance its interests. Moreover, it should be clear that the problems and their impacts are trans-boundary that need transnational cooperative and integrative responses. The rebuilding of a failed state and preventing sates from failure through both curative and preventive approaches have to be the concerns of the 21st-century global governance, peace, and security narratives. Keywords: State, State Building, Securitization, Peace Operations, Burundi, Democratic- Republic- of- Congo- DRC, Somalia DOI: 10.7176/IAGS/88-02 Publication date: November 30 th 2020","PeriodicalId":358479,"journal":{"name":"International Affairs and Global Strategy","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Affairs and Global Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/iags/88-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

States fragility, failure and collapse are the results of both domestic and external determinant factors. This article provides a critique of the debates of failing states, failed states, and collapsed states in Africa by examining three cases: DRC, Burundi, and Somalia. It tries to highlight the impacts of external interventions on functionality, viability and sovereignty of African states. It presents the various interventions and their impacts on state viability in Africa. It argued that by taking similar paths of intervention with the same logic of the past, it is difficult to solve problems related to state failures in Africa. Instead, there has to be a different path of the state-building process that takes into account Africa’s realities and the interest of the majority, not the interests of the elites and the donors. Besides, instead of focusing on the idea of the liberal peace theory of republicanism, cosmopolitanism, and a free-market economy, it is better to address state-society relations in Africa. Hence, Africa should import those devices and institutions that advance its interests. Moreover, it should be clear that the problems and their impacts are trans-boundary that need transnational cooperative and integrative responses. The rebuilding of a failed state and preventing sates from failure through both curative and preventive approaches have to be the concerns of the 21st-century global governance, peace, and security narratives. Keywords: State, State Building, Securitization, Peace Operations, Burundi, Democratic- Republic- of- Congo- DRC, Somalia DOI: 10.7176/IAGS/88-02 Publication date: November 30 th 2020
外部干预与国家脆弱性、失败与崩溃:非洲经验的比较分析
国家的脆弱、失败和崩溃是内外决定因素共同作用的结果。本文通过考察三个案例(刚果民主共和国、布隆迪和索马里),对非洲关于失败国家、失败国家和崩溃国家的辩论进行了批判。它试图强调外部干预对非洲国家功能、生存能力和主权的影响。它介绍了各种干预措施及其对非洲国家生存能力的影响。文章认为,如果按照过去相同的逻辑,采取类似的干预路径,很难解决与非洲国家失败有关的问题。相反,国家建设过程中必须有一条不同的道路,考虑到非洲的现实和大多数人的利益,而不是精英和捐助者的利益。此外,与其关注共和主义、世界主义和自由市场经济的自由和平理论,不如关注非洲的国家与社会关系。因此,非洲应该引进那些促进其利益的手段和机构。此外,应该清楚的是,这些问题及其影响是跨界的,需要跨国合作和综合对策。重建一个失败的国家,并通过治疗和预防两种方法防止国家失败,必须成为21世纪全球治理、和平与安全叙事的关注点。关键词:国家,国家建设,证券化,和平行动,布隆迪,刚果民主共和国,索马里DOI: 10.7176/IAGS/88-02出版日期:2020年11月30日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信