Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithm for Stock Price Prediction Using Sentiment Analysis

Anuradha Yenkikar, C. Babu
{"title":"Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithm for Stock Price Prediction Using Sentiment Analysis","authors":"Anuradha Yenkikar, C. Babu","doi":"10.1109/ESCI56872.2023.10099875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forecasting companies' stock market prices are one the interesting topics for analysts and researchers. Although a company's stock price can be unpredictable, long-term forecasts can help but it is dependent on many factors such as the company's business model, change in leadership, and investors' mood. It has been found to be insufficient to predict stock values just on the basis of historical data or textual information. Previous research in sentiment analysis have shown a strong correlation between the movement of stock prices and the publication of news stories. At different levels, a number of sentiment analysis research have been attempted utilizing methods. In this paper, we made a comparison of various Machine Learning methods on five datasets of financial news related to the company and domains in which the company. Encouraging results are obtained using 13 models i.e., Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, LSTM, ARIMA, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, Decision Tree, Boosted Tree, and ensemble method which depict polarity of news articles being positive or negative and the accuracies are 93.90%, 92.31 %, 92.27%, 85.44%, 84.65%, 84.65%, 94.73%, 90.13%, 82%, 83%, 72%, 70%, 95.11 % respectively.","PeriodicalId":441215,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCI56872.2023.10099875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forecasting companies' stock market prices are one the interesting topics for analysts and researchers. Although a company's stock price can be unpredictable, long-term forecasts can help but it is dependent on many factors such as the company's business model, change in leadership, and investors' mood. It has been found to be insufficient to predict stock values just on the basis of historical data or textual information. Previous research in sentiment analysis have shown a strong correlation between the movement of stock prices and the publication of news stories. At different levels, a number of sentiment analysis research have been attempted utilizing methods. In this paper, we made a comparison of various Machine Learning methods on five datasets of financial news related to the company and domains in which the company. Encouraging results are obtained using 13 models i.e., Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, LSTM, ARIMA, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, Decision Tree, Boosted Tree, and ensemble method which depict polarity of news articles being positive or negative and the accuracies are 93.90%, 92.31 %, 92.27%, 85.44%, 84.65%, 84.65%, 94.73%, 90.13%, 82%, 83%, 72%, 70%, 95.11 % respectively.
基于情绪分析的股票价格预测机器学习算法比较
预测公司的股票市场价格是分析师和研究人员感兴趣的话题之一。虽然一家公司的股价是不可预测的,但长期预测可以有所帮助,但这取决于许多因素,如公司的商业模式、领导层的变化和投资者的情绪。人们发现,仅仅根据历史数据或文字信息来预测股票价值是不够的。先前在情绪分析方面的研究表明,股票价格的变动与新闻报道的发表之间存在很强的相关性。在不同的层次上,人们尝试了一些情感分析的研究方法。在本文中,我们对与公司和公司所在领域相关的五个金融新闻数据集的各种机器学习方法进行了比较。采用线性回归、Ridge回归、Lasso回归、随机森林、朴素贝叶斯、Logistic回归、LSTM、ARIMA、Logistic回归、支持向量机、决策树、提升树、集成方法等13种模型描述新闻文章的正负性,准确率分别为93.90%、92.31%、92.27%、85.44%、84.65%、84.65%、94.73%、90.13%、82%、83%、72%、70%、95.11%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信