The U.S. and the EU differences in anti-terrorism efforts

M. Gallagher
{"title":"The U.S. and the EU differences in anti-terrorism efforts","authors":"M. Gallagher","doi":"10.1109/ISI.2010.5484777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there is a consensus among developed countries over the need to combat terrorism, there are marked differences on how to accomplish that. Recently the European Union (EU) rejected a US-EU agreement on financial data exchange. Shifts in power in Europe are taking place, which contributed to this rejection. But more basically, there is a difference in views on the balance between about managing anti-terrorism efforts and respect for civil liberties, especially in data sharing. The post-WWII alliances are still strong, but Europe has a different take on many issues. In our interdependent globalized world, U.S. authorities are being required to adjust the tools and methods we can use. The sympathy and readiness to assist in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 have now faded. We should understand these differences and realize we are entering a period where being creative and factoring in the views of our allies is essential if we are to pursue successfully those who would do us harm.","PeriodicalId":434501,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2010.5484777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While there is a consensus among developed countries over the need to combat terrorism, there are marked differences on how to accomplish that. Recently the European Union (EU) rejected a US-EU agreement on financial data exchange. Shifts in power in Europe are taking place, which contributed to this rejection. But more basically, there is a difference in views on the balance between about managing anti-terrorism efforts and respect for civil liberties, especially in data sharing. The post-WWII alliances are still strong, but Europe has a different take on many issues. In our interdependent globalized world, U.S. authorities are being required to adjust the tools and methods we can use. The sympathy and readiness to assist in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 have now faded. We should understand these differences and realize we are entering a period where being creative and factoring in the views of our allies is essential if we are to pursue successfully those who would do us harm.
美国和欧盟在反恐方面存在分歧
虽然发达国家在打击恐怖主义的必要性上达成了共识,但在如何实现这一目标方面却存在显著分歧。最近,欧盟(EU)否决了一项美欧金融数据交换协议。欧洲正在发生权力转移,这促成了这种拒绝。但更基本的是,在管理反恐努力和尊重公民自由之间的平衡问题上,尤其是在数据共享方面,存在不同的看法。二战后的联盟仍然强大,但欧洲在许多问题上有不同的看法。在我们相互依存的全球化世界中,美国当局被要求调整我们可以使用的工具和方法。在9/11事件发生后立即提供帮助的同情和意愿现在已经消退。我们应该理解这些差异,并认识到我们正在进入这样一个时期:如果我们要成功地追捕那些想要伤害我们的人,那么发挥创造力并考虑盟友的观点是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信