Analysing the Geospatial Patterns of Hidden Impacts from Human-Elephant Interactions in the Bunda District, Tanzania

A. Mamboleo, C. Doscher, A. Paterson
{"title":"Analysing the Geospatial Patterns of Hidden Impacts from Human-Elephant Interactions in the Bunda District, Tanzania","authors":"A. Mamboleo, C. Doscher, A. Paterson","doi":"10.3808/jeil.201900016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"study was conducted in Bunda district, which is a Tanzanian community with high annual incidents of human-elephant interactions, to determine a geographical configuration of hidden impacts. These are indirect impacts and largely unreported adverse effects resulting from human and elephant interactions. These are the effects which usually go unnoticed and unreported due to the lack of visible damage. Spatial analyses of patterns of human-elephant interactions have focused on environmental to socio-economic perspectives rather than spatial aspects of hidden patterns. The study analyzed the distribution, proximity to protected areas, kernel density and hotspots analysis of hidden impacts. The study identified 327 hidden impacts, categorized into the abandonment of farms, marriage problems, delayed school attendances and restriction on movement. It ascertained the highest number of incidents (18.35%) from Kihumbu village and the lowest from Nyangere village (0.01%). Abandonment of farms constituted the largest number (77.4%) while marriage problems formed the lowest number (0.6%) of hidden impacts. The most hidden impacts occurred between 0 and 2000 meters from the boundaries of protected areas. There was a higher concentration of hidden impacts in villages bordering Grumeti Game Reserve than Serengeti National Park. The significant statistical level of adverse hidden impacts occurred in Kihumbu village. Imprecisely execution of tourist hunting operations could presumably be the causing factor for the high concentration of hidden effects nearby Grumeti Game Reserve. However, we recommend a comprehensive study for an intensive understanding of the spatial characteristics of other types of hidden impacts adjacent to protected areas.","PeriodicalId":143718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3808/jeil.201900016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

study was conducted in Bunda district, which is a Tanzanian community with high annual incidents of human-elephant interactions, to determine a geographical configuration of hidden impacts. These are indirect impacts and largely unreported adverse effects resulting from human and elephant interactions. These are the effects which usually go unnoticed and unreported due to the lack of visible damage. Spatial analyses of patterns of human-elephant interactions have focused on environmental to socio-economic perspectives rather than spatial aspects of hidden patterns. The study analyzed the distribution, proximity to protected areas, kernel density and hotspots analysis of hidden impacts. The study identified 327 hidden impacts, categorized into the abandonment of farms, marriage problems, delayed school attendances and restriction on movement. It ascertained the highest number of incidents (18.35%) from Kihumbu village and the lowest from Nyangere village (0.01%). Abandonment of farms constituted the largest number (77.4%) while marriage problems formed the lowest number (0.6%) of hidden impacts. The most hidden impacts occurred between 0 and 2000 meters from the boundaries of protected areas. There was a higher concentration of hidden impacts in villages bordering Grumeti Game Reserve than Serengeti National Park. The significant statistical level of adverse hidden impacts occurred in Kihumbu village. Imprecisely execution of tourist hunting operations could presumably be the causing factor for the high concentration of hidden effects nearby Grumeti Game Reserve. However, we recommend a comprehensive study for an intensive understanding of the spatial characteristics of other types of hidden impacts adjacent to protected areas.
坦桑尼亚班达地区人象互动隐性影响的地理空间格局分析
研究是在本达地区进行的,这是一个坦桑尼亚社区,每年人象互动事件频发,以确定隐藏影响的地理分布。这些都是人类和大象相互作用造成的间接影响和大部分未报告的不利影响。由于缺乏可见的损害,这些影响通常不被注意和未报告。人象互动模式的空间分析侧重于环境到社会经济的角度,而不是隐藏模式的空间方面。研究分析了潜在影响的分布、与保护区的接近程度、核密度和热点分析。该研究确定了327个潜在影响,包括放弃农场、婚姻问题、延迟上学和限制行动。它确定Kihumbu村的发病率最高(18.35%),Nyangere村最低(0.01%)。在隐性影响中,弃养占比最高(77.4%),婚姻问题占比最低(0.6%)。最隐蔽的影响发生在距离保护区边界0 - 2000米之间。与塞伦盖蒂国家公园相比,格鲁梅蒂野生动物保护区周边村庄的隐性影响集中度更高。Kihumbu村发生了显著的统计水平的不利隐性影响。游客狩猎活动的不精确执行可能是格鲁梅蒂野生动物保护区附近隐藏效应高度集中的原因。然而,我们建议进行全面的研究,以深入了解保护区附近其他类型的隐性影响的空间特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信