R. Martínek, R. Kahankova, P. Bilik, J. Nedoma, M. Fajkus, Petr Blaha
{"title":"Speech Quality Assessment Based on Virtual Instrumentation","authors":"R. Martínek, R. Kahankova, P. Bilik, J. Nedoma, M. Fajkus, Petr Blaha","doi":"10.1145/3177457.3177459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces a program for objective and subjective evaluation of speech quality. Using this environment, a lot of speech recordings and various indoor and outdoor noises were processed. As a subjective speech evaluation method, the Dynamic time warping (DTW) method was selected, with PARCOR coefficients being chosen as symptom vectors. For the filtration of the noise in the recording, adaptive filtering based on LMS and RLS algorithms was used and the performance of the adaptive filtering was assessed. Similarity ranged from 70% to 95% for both algorithms. In terms of signal to noise ratio, the RLS algorithm ranged from 36 dB to 42 dB, while the LMS algorithm only varied from 20 dB to 29 dB.","PeriodicalId":297531,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3177457.3177459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This paper introduces a program for objective and subjective evaluation of speech quality. Using this environment, a lot of speech recordings and various indoor and outdoor noises were processed. As a subjective speech evaluation method, the Dynamic time warping (DTW) method was selected, with PARCOR coefficients being chosen as symptom vectors. For the filtration of the noise in the recording, adaptive filtering based on LMS and RLS algorithms was used and the performance of the adaptive filtering was assessed. Similarity ranged from 70% to 95% for both algorithms. In terms of signal to noise ratio, the RLS algorithm ranged from 36 dB to 42 dB, while the LMS algorithm only varied from 20 dB to 29 dB.
本文介绍了一个语音质量的客观和主观评价程序。在这种环境下,对大量的语音录音和各种室内外噪声进行了处理。选择动态时间规整(DTW)方法作为主观语音评价方法,以PARCOR系数作为症状向量。对录音中的噪声进行滤波,采用了基于LMS和RLS算法的自适应滤波,并对自适应滤波的性能进行了评价。两种算法的相似度在70%到95%之间。在信噪比方面,RLS算法的范围为36 dB ~ 42 dB,而LMS算法的范围仅为20 dB ~ 29 dB。