The effect of 8 weeks of block and traditional periodization training models on practical factors in volleyball players

Mohammad Javad Tavakkoli, Mahdi Abbaspoor, R. Nikooie
{"title":"The effect of 8 weeks of block and traditional periodization training models on practical factors in volleyball players","authors":"Mohammad Javad Tavakkoli, Mahdi Abbaspoor, R. Nikooie","doi":"10.55860/ymmu8246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 8 weeks of traditional and block periodization training models on practical factors in volleyball players. 13 male volleyball players (mean ± SD; age: 17 ± 0.70 years; body mass: 68 ± 12.13 kg; stature: 181 ± 17.13; BMI: 20 ± 3.03) from the same team were divided in two groups (BP: 6; TP: 7). The subjects performed 3 training sessions in volleyball court per week for 8 weeks. The subjects implemented 3 testing stages (before starting, mid and after 8 weeks) including Vertical Jump, Illinois, Pro-agility and T Agility Tests, Shuttle run 300-yard, Side jumps in 60 second and, finally, Hand grip. Between-group changes were assessed using repeated measure analysis. There were not significant differences between group-time interaction effect, in Vertical jump (p ˃ .05), Agility time (p ˃ .05), Power endurance (p ˃ .05) and Special aerobic endurance (p ˃ .05). This means that there were not significant differences between the groups in improving practical training factors; but Time effect was significant (p ˂ .05). In addition, Block periodization showed higher means in the strength of arm and forearm at the end of protocol.","PeriodicalId":224249,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Sport and Performance","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Sport and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55860/ymmu8246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 8 weeks of traditional and block periodization training models on practical factors in volleyball players. 13 male volleyball players (mean ± SD; age: 17 ± 0.70 years; body mass: 68 ± 12.13 kg; stature: 181 ± 17.13; BMI: 20 ± 3.03) from the same team were divided in two groups (BP: 6; TP: 7). The subjects performed 3 training sessions in volleyball court per week for 8 weeks. The subjects implemented 3 testing stages (before starting, mid and after 8 weeks) including Vertical Jump, Illinois, Pro-agility and T Agility Tests, Shuttle run 300-yard, Side jumps in 60 second and, finally, Hand grip. Between-group changes were assessed using repeated measure analysis. There were not significant differences between group-time interaction effect, in Vertical jump (p ˃ .05), Agility time (p ˃ .05), Power endurance (p ˃ .05) and Special aerobic endurance (p ˃ .05). This means that there were not significant differences between the groups in improving practical training factors; but Time effect was significant (p ˂ .05). In addition, Block periodization showed higher means in the strength of arm and forearm at the end of protocol.
8周阻滞训练与传统周期训练模式对排球运动员实践因素的影响
本研究的目的是探讨8周的传统训练模式和分段周期训练模式对排球运动员实际因素的影响。男子排球运动员13名(mean±SD;年龄:17±0.70岁;体重:68±12.13 kg;身高:181±17.13;BMI: 20±3.03),分为两组(BP: 6;TP: 7).受试者每周进行3次排球场训练,持续8周。受试者实施了3个测试阶段(开始前,中期和8周后),包括垂直跳跃,伊利诺伊,专业敏捷和T敏捷测试,穿梭跑300码,侧身跳60秒,最后,手握。采用重复测量分析评估组间变化。在垂直跳跃(p > 0.05)、敏捷时间(p > 0.05)、力量耐力(p > 0.05)和特殊有氧耐力(p > 0.05)方面,组间相互作用效果无显著差异。这意味着两组在提高实践训练因素上没有显著差异;但时间效应显著(p小于0.05)。此外,在方案结束时,块周期化在手臂和前臂的力量方面显示更高的平均值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信